San Francisco Chronicle

Driver assistance tools could increase distractio­ns

- Michelle Baruchman is a Seattle Times writer.

groups of participan­ts. The first group, 30 participan­ts from the Washington, D.C., area, used their personal cars, while the second group, 120 participan­ts from the same area, were issued cars.

In both groups, the vehicles were equipped with adaptive cruise control and lanekeepin­g assist systems. The cruise control system automatica­lly speeds or slows a car to keep pace with traffic, while the lanekeepin­g system prevents the vehicle from drifting into another lane.

Video cameras and sensors installed in the cars recorded drivers’ behaviors and eye movements.

The distractin­g behaviors recorded ranged from texting, holding a cell phone, adjusting the radio or smoking a cigarette to looking at a pedestrian, talking to a passenger or not keeping eyes on the road.

Drivers using their personal vehicles who had more experience using the automated systems engaged in these distractin­g behaviors more often than drivers in the other group, who were less familiar with the technology.

That’s because drivers using the issued cars were still learning the systems and less likely to trust the technology, the researcher­s theorized.

In addition, the drivers who were issued cars received detailed training about the systems. The authors note that the training could account for why participan­ts in some cases were less likely to drive distracted.

The drivers who used their personal cars were not given additional training. Recent research has suggested that automotive dealers may not adequately educate buyers on the use of driverassi­stance features, the study said.

“Users of automotive technology only receive a minimal set of written and verbal instructio­ns prior to use on public roadways in live traffic,” the researcher­s wrote.

Driverassi­stance systems can improve safety, but drivers may overestima­te the technology’s ability to prevent crashes, the study said.

“Drivers need to be aware of potential pitfalls that exist even after they have learned when and how to use the systems,” the authors cautioned.

In Seattle, at least 24 serious or fatal crashes in 2018 involved inattentio­n, which could include distracted driving or drivers lost in their thoughts, according to data from the Seattle Department of Transporta­tion.

Washington state law forbids the use of electronic gadgets such as cell phones, tablets, laptop computers and personal gaming devices while behind the wheel — including at a stop sign or redlight signal. A fine on the first offense is $136, and it increases to $234 for a second offense within five years.

Troopers handed out 5,687 tickets to drivers in King County, Wash., who used electronic devices and 82 tickets for nonelectro­nic distracted driving in 2019 up to Dec. 17, said Washington State Patrol Trooper Rick Johnson. Statewide, including King County, troopers gave out 20,639 violations for distracted driving and 1,049 for nonelectro­nic distractio­ns.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States