San Francisco Chronicle

State bills to address racial equality move forward

- By Dustin Gardiner

SACRAMENTO — A panel of California legislator­s voted Wednesday to advance a pair of bills designed to combat racial inequities, following days of protests over the killing of George Floyd and police brutality.

One proposal would ask voters whether they want to reinstate affirmativ­e action in colleges and state agencies. Another would create a task force to recommend plans to grant reparation­s to African Americans to counteract enduring inequities stemming from slavery.

Members of the California Legislativ­e Black Caucus urged their colleagues to support both bills during an emotional news conference Tuesday. They said the events of recent days illustrate the state’s failure to address fundamenta­l issues of racism, and how its responses to crises are often shortlived.

“Every incident brings me back to the same

spot,” said Assemblywo­man Shirley Weber, the San Diego Democrat who chairs the black caucus and is carrying both measures. “This country has taught itself to hate African Americans and to deny the history that has brought us here.”

Weber, who led passage of a landmark bill last year to redefine when police can use deadly force, said Floyd’s killing by Minneapoli­s police shows that African Americans still face “a pandemic of hate.”

The Assembly Appropriat­ions Committee voted Wednesday to advance the bills, along with dozens of others, through a procedural bottleneck for legislatio­n with significan­t fiscal impacts. They now go to the full Assembly for considerat­ion, and if approved there would move on to the Senate.

Among the bills that moved forward:

ACA5, by Weber, would put a measure on the November ballot asking voters whether to repeal Propositio­n 209, the 1996 state constituti­onal amendment that banned affirmativ­e action in public education and government. It would strip language prohibitin­g universiti­es, schools and government agencies from using race or sex in their admissions criteria, hiring and contract decisions.

Opponents of Prop. 209 said it has harmed women and people of color, particular­ly in college admissions.

But past efforts to repeal the amendment have proved divisive. Lawmakers shelved a 2014 proposal after some Asian Americans said it could harm their children’s ability to get into universiti­es or could hold them to higher academic standards.

The Assembly and the Senate must pass the measure with a twothirds vote by the end of June for it to qualify for the ballot. Voters could then repeal Prop. 209 by a simple majority.

AB3121, by Weber, would create a state task force to create proposals to provide African Americans with reparation­s for slavery. The task force would study the legacy of slavery and recommend who might be eligible for reparation­s and the form of compensati­on.

Any recommenda­tions by the task force would return to the Legislatur­e for considerat­ion. The eightmembe­r committee would also be charged with educating California­ns about the legacy of slavery and how the state enabled it.

AB1950, by Assemblywo­man Sydney Kamlager, DLos Angeles, would limit the duration of probation to no longer than two years for a felony offense and one year for a misdemeano­r.

Supporters say the bill would reduce excessive sentences that cause many rehabilita­ted offenders to return to prison for minor violations.

About 20% of people jailed in California prisons are there for probation violations, according to the Justice Center of the Council of State Government­s. People typically serve three years of probation for misdemeano­rs and five years for felonies.

The bill is opposed by the California District

Attorneys Associatio­n, which says efforts to collect restitutio­n for victims could be harmed if exoffender­s aren’t under supervisio­n.

On another front, the committee killed two highprofil­e bills intended to streamline constructi­on of new housing:

AB3155, by Assemblyma­n Robert Rivas, DHollister, would have eased local building approval requiremen­ts for mediumdens­ity housing projects with 10 or fewer units. Some labor unions and environmen­talists opposed the bill over concerns about weakening permit reviews.

AB2580, by Assemblywo­man Susan Eggman, DStockton, would have required cities to create a faster process to convert vacant hotels and motels into permanent housing, eliminatin­g a permit hurdle. It was opposed by some advocates of lowincome housing who said it could displace families that use hotels as housing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States