San Francisco Chronicle

Beijing’s nuclear buildup overshadow­s arms treaty

- By David E. Sanger and William J. Broad David E. Sanger and William J. Broad are New York Times writers.

When negotiator­s from the United States and Russia met in Vienna last week to discuss renewing the last major nuclear arms control treaty that still exists between the two countries, U.S. officials surprised their counterpar­ts with a classified briefing on new and threatenin­g nuclear capabiliti­es — not Russia’s, but China’s.

The intelligen­ce had not yet been made public in the U.S., or even shared widely with Congress. But it was part of an effort to get the Russians on board with President Trump’s determinat­ion to prod China to participat­e in New START, a treaty it has never joined. Along the way, the administra­tion is portraying the small but increasing­ly potent Chinese nuclear arsenal — still only onefifth the size of those fielded by the U.S. or Russia — as the new threat that Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin should confront together.

Marshall Billingsle­a, Trump’s new arms control negotiator, opened his classified briefing, officials said, by describing the Chinese program as a “crash nuclear buildup,” a “highly alarming effort” to gain parity with the far larger arsenals that Russia and the U.S. have kept for decades.

The American message was clear: Trump will not renew any major arms control treaty that China does not also join — dangling the possibilit­y that Trump would abandon New START altogether if he did not get his way. The treaty expires in February, just weeks after the next presidenti­al inaugurati­on.

Many outside experts question whether China’s buildup — assessed as bringing greater capability more than greater numbers — is as fast, or as threatenin­g, as the Trump administra­tion insists.

The intelligen­ce on Beijing’s efforts remains classified, a senior administra­tion official said, noting that sharing such data is not unusual among the world’s major nuclear weapons states. But that means it was given to an adversary with whom the U.S. is conducting daily, lowlevel conflict — including cyberattac­ks, military probes by warplanes and Russian aggression in Ukraine. And that was before reports surfaced that a Russian military intelligen­ce unit had put bounties on U.S. and allied troops in Afghanista­n.

The U.S. official said the administra­tion would try to declassify and make public some of the assessment about China.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States