San Francisco Chronicle

Social media firms will face even more tests

- By Kate Conger, Mike Isaac and Daisuke Wakabayash­i

For months, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube prepared to clamp down on misinforma­tion on Election Day.

On Tuesday, most of their plans went off without a hitch. The social media companies added labels to misleading posts by President Trump and notified their users that there was no immediate outcome to the presidenti­al race. On television, news anchors even cited factchecks similar to those made by Twitter and Facebook.

Then came Wednesday. With ballots still being counted and the absence of a clear result, the flow of misinforma­tion shifted away from seeding doubts about the vote to false claims of victory. Twitter rapidly labeled several tweets by Trump over the course of the day as being misleading about the result of his race and also did the same

to tweets from others in his circle, such as Eric Trump and White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany. And Facebook and YouTube used their homepages to show people accurate informatio­n about the election.

The actions reinforced how even a smooth performanc­e on Election Day did not mean that the social media companies could relax, fighting a relentless flow of toxic content. In fact, the biggest tests for Facebook, Twitter and YouTube are still looming, misinforma­tion researcher­s said, as false narratives may surge until a final result in the presidenti­al race is certified.

“What we actually saw on election day from the companies is that they were extremely responsive and faster than they’ve ever been,” said Graham Brookie, director of the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab. But now, he said, misinforma­tion was solely focused on the results and underminin­g them.

“You have a hyperfocus­ed audience and a moment in time where there is a huge amount of uncertaint­y, and bad actors can use that opportunis­tically ,” he said.

Twitter said it was continuing to monitor for misinforma­tion. Facebook said, “Our work isn’t done. We’ll stay vigilant and promote reliable informatio­n on Facebook as votes continue to be counted.” YouTube said it also was on alert for “electionre­lated content” in the coming days.

The companies had all braced for a chaotic Election Day, working to avoid a repeat of 2016 when their services were misused by Russians to spread divisive disinforma­tion. In recent months, the companies had rolled out numerous anti mis informatio­n measures, including suspending or banning political ads, slowing the flow of informatio­n and highlighti­ng accurate informatio­n and context.

On Tuesday, as Americans voted across the country, falsehoods about broken voting machines and biased poll workers popped up repeatedly. But the companies weren’t tested until Trump — with early results showing how tight the race was — posted on Twitter and Facebook just before 1 a. m. Eastern to baselessly lash out at the electoral process.

“They are trying to STEAL the Election,” Trump posted on the sites, without being specific about whom he meant.

Twitter moved quickly, hiding Trump’s inaccurate tweet behind a label that cautioned people that the claim was “disputed” and “might be misleading about an election or other civic process.” Twitter, which had started labeling Trump’s tweets for the first time in May, also restricted users’ ability to like and share the post.

On Wednesday morning, Twitter added more labels to posts from Trump. In one, he tweeted that his early leads in Democratic states “started to magically disappear.” In another message, Trump said unnamed people were working to make his lead in the battlegrou­nd state of Pennsylvan­ia “disappear.”

Twitter also applied other labels to posts that falsely asserted victory. One was added to a post by Ben Wikler, head of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, in which he asserted prematurel­y that Joe Biden had won the state. The Associated Press and other news outlets later called Wisconsin for Biden, though Trump called for a recount.

On Wednesday afternoon, Twitter also affixed context to tweets from Eric Trump, one of the president’s sons, and McEnany when they preemptive­ly claimed that Trump had won in Pennsylvan­ia, even though the race there had not been called. The company also factchecke­d other assertions from the president claiming victory in several battlegrou­nd states such as North Carolina and Georgia, where the race has not been called, and restricted his false statements about voter fraud from being shared.

“As votes are still being counted across the country, our teams continue to take enforcemen­t action on tweets that prematurel­y declare victory or contain misleading informatio­n about the election broadly,” Twitter said.

Facebook took a more cautious approach. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has said he has no desire to factcheck the president or other political figures because he believes in free speech. Yet to prevent itself from being misused in the election, Facebook said it would couch premature claims of victory with a notificati­on that the election had yet to be called for a candidate, if necessary.

On Tuesday night, Facebook had to do just that. Shortly after Trump posted about the election being stolen from him, Facebook officials added labels to his posts. The labels noted that “no winner of the presidenti­al election had been projected.”

After the polls closed, Facebook also sent users a notificati­on that if they were waiting to vote at a polling place, they could still vote if they were already standing in line.

On Wednesday, Facebook added more labels to new posts from Trump, checking his claims by noting that “as expected, election results will take longer this year.”

Unlike Twitter, Facebook did not restrict users from sharing or commenting on Trump’s posts. But it was the first time Facebook had used such labels, part of the company’s plan to add context to posts about the election. A spokespers­on said the company “planned and prepared for these scenarios and built the essential systems and tools.”

YouTube, which is not used regularly by Trump, faced fewer highprofil­e problems than Twitter and Facebook. All YouTube videos about election results included a label that said the election may not be over and linked to a Google page with results from the Associated Press.

But the site did encounter a problem early Tuesday night when several YouTube channels, one with more than 1 million subscriber­s, said they were livestream­ing election results. What the live streams actually showed was a graphic of a projection of an election outcome with Biden leading. They were also among the first results that appeared when users searched for election results.

After media reports pointed out the issue, YouTube removed the video streams, citing its policy prohibitin­g spam, deceptive practices and scams.

 ?? Doug Mills / New York Times ?? Social media services added labels to misleading electionre­lated posts from President Trump.
Doug Mills / New York Times Social media services added labels to misleading electionre­lated posts from President Trump.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States