San Francisco Chronicle

‘ Dreamers’ seeing hope with Biden

Immigrants brought to U. S. as kids want him to offer path to citizenshi­p

- By Tatiana Sanchez

When Joe Biden won the presidenti­al election, Vanessa Mejia said she felt hope again.

Hope that she and hundreds of thousands of undocument­ed immigrants brought to the United States illegally when they were young can remain in the country under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program.

President Trump ended

DACA in 2017, setting off a tumultuous and lengthy legal battle that reached the U. S. Supreme Court and left “Dreamers” — as DACA beneficiar­ies are often called — in limbo for several years. In recent months, the administra­tion has refused to process new applicatio­ns and has slashed eligibilit­y for DACA, ignoring court orders.

But the program establishe­d under an executive action by thenPresid­ent BaPhotos

“As a DACA recipient, having Trump as president, we didn’t know what was going to happen with our future.” Maria Fuentes, paralegal with Central American Resource Center

rack Obama in 2012 will probably gain new life under Biden, who has pledged to reinstate it within his first 100 days in office.

“I feel like I can dream again,” said Mejia, 24, of Oakland, a DACA recipient whose aunt brought her to the U. S. from El Salvador at age 8 to join Mejia’s parents. “I dream that someday I’ll be able to visit my ( first) country again and be called a ( legal U. S.) resident instead of an alien.”

Biden has said that a priority of his presidency will be this program, a key component of U. S. immigratio­n policy that erupted into a tugofwar under Trump. Surveys and studies show that Americans feel DACA recipients deserve to stay in the U. S. because they were brought to the country as children and consider this home. They also contribute significan­tly to the economy, they say.

A 2018 report by Democrats on the U. S. Small Business Committee predicted a $ 400 billion loss in the gross domestic product over the next decade if the program were to end.

Opponents argue Obama never had the legal authority to implement DACA in the first place, even if it protects people who were raised in this country and contribute economical­ly.

“The issue of whether a president has the authority to simply declare an entire class of law violators exempt from any kind of enforcemen­t is one that needs to be tested in the courts,” said Ira Mehlman, spokesman for the Federation for American Immigratio­n Reform in Washington, D. C., which supports hardline immigratio­n policies. “It should have been tested back in 2012 when President Obama first implemente­d it.”

There were nearly 644,000 DACA recipients across the U. S. as of March, according to U. S. Citizenshi­p and Immigratio­n Services, which oversees the program.

DACA benefits immigrants brought to the U. S. illegally before age 16 who have attended school or served in the military and have no serious criminal record. It was intended to offer a reprieve from deportatio­n for these people, many of whom have lived in the U. S. for most of their life. The program allows Dreamers to work legally and obtain a driver’s license. Eligible immigrants had been allowed to renew their status every two years if they lived continuous­ly in the U. S. and committed no significan­t misdemeano­rs or worse. DACA provides no pathway to citizenshi­p.

An estimated 74% of Americans said they favor a law that would provide permanent legal status to Dreamers, according to a June poll of more than 9,600 people by Pew Research. Along partisan lines, 91% of Democrats said they support legalizati­on for Dreamers, compared with roughly 54% of Republican­s, Pew said.

Trump’s hardline immigratio­n policies — including rescinding DACA and separating parents and children at the border — formed a cornerston­e of his presidency. But even the president gave mixed messages on the program, at times appearing sympatheti­c to Dreamers.

He has expressed “great love” for Dreamers but has said they are “far from angels.”

Biden’s support for the program is clear. But Dreamers say they want more.

“As a DACA recipient, having Trump as president, we didn’t know what was going to happen with our future,” said Maria Fuentes, 24, a paralegal with the Central American Resource Center, or CARECEN, in San Francisco. “My hopes are that Biden actually does something for us permanentl­y and doesn’t just keep extending DACA.”

Biden’s immigratio­n plan includes reinstatin­g DACA within his first 100 days in office, exploring “all legal options to protect their families from inhumane separation,” and giving Dreamers the right to receive federal student aid, including loans and Pell grants.

Laura Sanchez, an attorney and director of CARECEN’s immigratio­n legal program, said Biden’s win is “a big sigh of relief” for Dreamers who have spent the past several years in limbo. But they want permanence under the new administra­tion, she said.

“They want a pathway to citizenshi­p, not just for them but for the 11 million immigrants that are undocument­ed. That’s the end goal,” she said. “DACA is a BandAid, and it depends on the administra­tion that’s in power. It’s temporary, and it’s not an actual solution.”

The Supreme Court in June ruled that Trump acted illegally when he repealed DACA.

The high court said Trump failed to adequately explain his decision to eliminate the program and that he neglected to consider the impact on more than 700,000 immigrants who relied on DACA, or their 200,000 U. S. citizen children.

The court did not prohibit Trump from making another attempt to eliminate DACA, but ordered it reinstated in the meantime. The administra­tion had stopped accepting new DACA applicants since September 2017 but had been required by lower courts to allow renewals by current participan­ts.

In July, a federal judge in Maryland ordered the administra­tion to restore DACA to its previous status and accept new applicatio­ns.

But two weeks later, Chad Wolf, Trump’s acting secretary of Homeland Security, said no new applicatio­ns would be accepted, and current DACA participan­ts could renew for only one year instead of two. He also said immigrants in the program would no longer be allowed to leave the United States and return legally, apart from “exceptiona­l circumstan­ces.”

In a lawsuit filed Nov. 2 against the Trump administra­tion, California, joined by Maine, Maryland and Minnesota, said its antiDACA actions were irrational and inhumane, as well as illegal, because Wolf ignored court orders to reinstate the program and was never lawfully appointed to his position.

On Saturday, a New York judge ruled in a separate lawsuit challengin­g Wolf’s memorandum, finding Wolf was not lawfully appointed to his position and so making the memorandum invalid. The ruling clears the way for the full reinstatem­ent of DACA, though when that will happen was not immediatel­y unclear.

The ruling also certified a nationwide class for current DACA recipients and individual­s eligible to apply, totaling more than 1 million people, according to Karen Tumlin, director and founder of the Justice Action Center and counsel for the case. It does not include recipients who filed their own federal lawsuits.

Mark Rosenbaum, an attorney for some of the plaintiffs in the Supreme Court case, said it’s possible Biden will restore DACA “within the first day or two” of his presidency.

“The word is that he will issue an executive order that will restore DACA to what the Supreme Court said this administra­tion should do and didn’t do,” Rosenbaum said. “I think it’s highly likely that DACA will be back in place in the manner it was before the Trump administra­tion rescinded it in the first place.”

The move will be “a unifying measure” that will help boost the economy, he said.

“I think you will see a move to go to Congress to not just restore it but to provide a path for citizenshi­p for these individual­s.”

 ?? By Santiago Mejia / The Chronicle ?? Top: Maria Fuentes ( left) watches the TV news with her parents, her husband, Wilberth Ceh ( front), and her sister, Mariana Fuentes.
By Santiago Mejia / The Chronicle Top: Maria Fuentes ( left) watches the TV news with her parents, her husband, Wilberth Ceh ( front), and her sister, Mariana Fuentes.
 ??  ?? Above: Maria Fuentes with mother Aida Ruiz and father Santos Fuentes outside their home.
Above: Maria Fuentes with mother Aida Ruiz and father Santos Fuentes outside their home.
 ?? Jessica Christian / The Chronicle ?? Vanessa Mejia, a beneficiar­y of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, works with her father, Julio Mejia, at a Berkeley constructi­on site.
Jessica Christian / The Chronicle Vanessa Mejia, a beneficiar­y of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, works with her father, Julio Mejia, at a Berkeley constructi­on site.
 ?? Santiago Mejia / The Chronicle ?? Aida Ruiz holds a photo of herself at Pier 39 with her daughters, Mariana Fuentes ( left) and Maria Fuentes.
Santiago Mejia / The Chronicle Aida Ruiz holds a photo of herself at Pier 39 with her daughters, Mariana Fuentes ( left) and Maria Fuentes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States