San Francisco Chronicle

Politics: How Biden could affect student loan debt

- By Stacy Cowley and Tara Siegel Bernard

The federal government is the primary lender for students who borrow money for college and graduate school, and the Education Department directly holds more than $ 1.4 trillion in student debt. Presidente­lect Joe Biden’s administra­tion could make changes that affect millions of borrowers’ monthly bills.

Here’s what you need to know: Loan pause: An estimated 22 million borrowers of federal student loans have had their monthly payments temporaril­y paused and interest waived through the end of the year because of the pandemic — a suspension of payments on debt totaling more than $ 900 billion — and they’re anxious to learn whether the relief will continue into 2021.

President Trump, through an executive action, already extended the forbearanc­e through Dec. 31. ( It had been scheduled to expire Sept. 30 under an emergency legislativ­e package.) But it’s unclear whether he plans to provide another extension before Biden takes office in January. A spokeswoma­n for the Education Department declined to comment. Biden’s transition team also declined to comment.

Congress may feel pressure to act before the year ends, policy experts said, and it could include an extension in a stimulus package or other legislatio­n.

“For millions of borrowers, the fallout from the pandemic is still raging,” said Seth Frotman, executive director of the Student Borrower Protection Center, an advocacy group. “The thought that their student loan payments will be turned back on and they will get money taken out of their account via auto debit, or they will see their wages garnished once again

“For millions of borrowers, the fallout from the pandemic is still raging.” Seth Frotman, Student Borrower Protection Center

— the results will be cataclysmi­c for their finances.”

Debt cancellati­on: The highereduc­ation platform Biden campaigned on was noticeably silent about a proposal that progressiv­es say is ripe for executive action: cancellati­on of some student debt.

The Higher Education Act of 1965, which created the federal student loan program, authorizes the education secretary to “compromise, waive or release” federal student loan debts. Some legal scholars and key lawmakers believe that language gives the president the power to use an executive order to direct the Education Department to broadly discharge debts for any or all student borrowers. Others disagree and believe such an action would face legal challenges.

Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachuse­tts and Chuck Schumer of New York, both Democrats, have called for the next president to cancel up to $ 50,000 in debt per borrower. But Biden has never publicly endorsed the idea, and two people involved in his transition­planning discussion­s said his views had not changed. Without legislativ­e action by Congress — which is unlikely if Republican­s retain control of the Senate — broad student debt cancellati­on seems improbable.

Biden stirred excitement among student borrowers with a tweet in March that endorsed a pandemicre­lief proposal from Warren and other lawmakers seeking cancellati­on of at least $ 10,000 in federal student loan debt per person. However, that proposal called for Congress to authorize such relief — and so far, it has not. Without legislativ­e action, Biden may be reluctant to jam through a measure that would cost about $ 420 billion.

Incomedriv­en repayment

plans: Roughly 8.5 million federal loan borrowers are enrolled in incomedriv­en repayment plans, which try to help struggling debtors by linking their payments to how much they earn. There are four plans to choose from, but advocates say they’re not always affordable for the most vulnerable borrowers.

Biden proposed a more generous option: Individual­s earning $ 25,000 or less annually will not owe any payments on undergradu­ate federal loans, nor will they accrue interest. All other borrowers will pay 5% of their discretion­ary income — what remains of their paychecks after accounting for basics like food and housing — over $ 25,000. That’s compared with the 10% to 15% of discretion­ary income required by plans now. ( One plan demands 20%.) Under Biden’s plan, any remaining balance would be forgiven.

Biden also promised to go further: Erased debts are generally taxed as income, but he said he planned to change that. Making a permanent change to the tax code would require legislatio­n, but tax experts say there are other ways to eliminate the tax penalty.

Public service loan forgivenes­s: The enormous problems associated with the federal Public Service Loan Forgivenes­s program are well documented. The program was created in 2007 to attract workers to lowpaying government and nonprofit jobs in exchange for debt forgivenes­s; after a decade of ontime monthly payments, any remaining debt is wiped away. But borrowers have to be in the right type of repayment plan and have the right kind of federal loan, all while working in a qualifying position — and only 2.2% of applicatio­ns have been deemed eligible since the program began.

Biden said he would fix the problems plaguing the program “by securing passage” of a bill that would simplify the applicatio­n and certificat­ion processes, including making all loans and repayment plans eligible, while also providing partial forgivenes­s after five years. The legislatio­n has been introduced in both the House and Senate, but with only Democratic support.

Beyond strengthen­ing the existing program, Biden said he would create another forgivenes­s plan for workers in schools, government and other nonprofit organizati­ons. For each year of service, workers would be eligible to have $ 10,000 of their undergradu­ate or graduate debt erased for up to five years ( for a total of $ 50,000).

Relief for defrauded students: A rule known as “borrower defense to repayment” allows students who were seriously misled by the schools they attended to seek relief on their federal student loans. After several notorious forprofit chains collapsed, including Corinthian Colleges and ITT Technical Institute, hundreds of thousands of people flooded the Education Department with claims.

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos has fought them at every turn and let many applicatio­ns languish for years, until federal judges in some of the cases ordered her to speed things up. DeVos’ department responded with mass denials of the claims, sending out more than 83,000 in the last year. However, a federal judge in California questioned those denials in a ruling last month, calling them “perfunctor­y” and “potentiall­y unlawful.” The former students represente­d in the classactio­n case have asked the court to cancel DeVos’ denials.

Eileen Connor, legal director of the Project on Predatory Student Lending, which is representi­ng borrowers in the California case, said she hopes the Biden administra­tion would revive the spirit of the borrowerde­fense program and grant relief to hundreds of thousands of students who were defrauded. A new education secretary has the authority to overturn past denials, Connor said, and create new standards for adjudicati­ng the 80,000 applicatio­ns that are still pending.

Biden pledged during his campaign to forgive the debt of borrowers who “were deceived by the worst forprofit college or career profiteers.” He also said he would reinstate more permissive rules for the program that were enacted during the Obama administra­tion and eliminated by DeVos.

Private student loans: Both federal loans and private student loans can be discharged in bankruptcy, but they aren’t wiped away as easily as credit card and other consumer debt. Borrowers have to file a separate legal proceeding, and lawmakers have toughened the rules over the past several decades. In fact, Biden supported a 2005 law that made private student loans more difficult to discharge, but he has pledged to reverse that rule as president.

That may prove challengin­g because few Republican­s have supported any changes to the bankruptcy laws. A House bill has one Republican cosponsor, but the Senate’s version, led by Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, has only Democratic support.

Student loan servicing: The Education Department outsources the task of servicing its 42 million federal student loans, and government auditors and watchdogs have repeatedly criticized the contractor­s for doing a poor job. Building a better system is a bipartisan agency goal that stretches back to the Obama administra­tion, but actually doing that is complicate­d.

DeVos’ department repeatedly changed its plans and canceled bid solicitati­ons, which has led it to the brink of a crisis: Most of the agency’s servicing contracts run out in December 2021 and cannot be extended.

The agency’s lastditch effort to avert disaster was a new solicitati­on it posted last month, seeking two contractor­s to run an interim system. But that time frame is extremely tight, and if this latest solicitati­on fails, it faces two bad choices: Pay its existing vendors significan­tly higher rates to keep working, or shift millions of borrowers to new servicers, a process that has been chaotic in the past.

“We’re at the point in the whole studentloa­nservicing saga where the urgency is greater than it’s ever been,” said Clare McCann, the deputy director for federal higher education policy at New America, a leftleanin­g think thank. “This affects tens of million of borrowers, and it’s an issue that needs to be close to the top of the list.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States