San Francisco Chronicle

Kathleen Pender:

- KATHLEEN PENDER

From 750,000 to 1.6 million California­ns could abruptly lose unemployme­nt benefits by the end of this year.

Somewhere between 750,000 and 1.6 million California­ns will abruptly lose federal unemployme­nt benefits at the end of December, unless Congress passes and the president signs a bill extending them, according to two reports issued this week.

An analysis released Thursday by the California Policy Lab estimates that 750,000 California­ns will no longer receive benefits when two programs created under the federal Cares Act expire Dec. 26.

The Century Foundation, in a report issued Wednesday, estimated that 9.1 million

Americans, including 1.6 million in California, will lose benefits at year end.

Both programs come to a hard stop on Dec. 26, meaning those who have not yet received the maximum weeks of benefits available will lose them.

“The cutoff is the day after Christmas, which is so hideously brutal,” said Judy Conti, government affairs director with the National Employment Law Project. “That money is going toward food and gas, for utilities and mortgages. My main concern is the hit that unemployed workers and their families will take when they can’t afford the bare necessitie­s of life, but also what it could do to weaken our economy as a whole.”

During the past recession, federal unemployme­nt benefits “had a soft cutoff, which allowed individual­s already receiving benefits to continue doing so until their full term was exhausted, but stopped any additional workers from qualifying,” the Century report said. A soft cutoff “creates a gentle downward slope for workers and the economy, while a hard cutoff creates a cliff.”

Most people facing a hard cutoff are currently receiving Pandemic Unemployme­nt Assistance or PUA. In California, people who didn’t qualify for regular state unemployMi­llions

ment can get up to 46 weeks of PUA. This includes people who were selfemploy­ed, didn’t have enough earnings to qualify or had run out of state benefits.

The policy lab estimates that 583,000 people, or 40% of those receiving PUA in October, will lose it at year end. The other 60% will have found work or exited the program for other reasons before then, said Till von Wachter, faculty director at the California Policy Lab, a research center housed at UC Berkeley and UCLA.

The Century Foundation estimates that 1.6 million will lose PUA at year end.

The other people facing a hard cutoff are former employees receiving Pandemic Emergency Unemployme­nt Compensati­on, or PEUC. This program provides up to 13 weeks of federal benefits to people who exhaust their regular state unemployme­nt benefits, which last up to 26 weeks in California. It also ends Dec. 26.

The vast majority of people getting PEUC can transition to yet another benefit program when they exhaust their 13 weeks or when PEUC ends, whichever comes first. This program is called FederalSta­te Extended Duration. Most states call it “extended benefits,” but in California it’s called FedEd.

Today, people in California can get up to 20 weeks of FedEd. When PEUC ends, people will transition straight from regular state benefits to FedEd. ( People who were receiving PUA are not eligible for FedEd.)

FedEd is a longstandi­ng program that kicks in during periods of high unemployme­nt and provides extended state benefits based on the state’s unemployme­nt rate. Not all states provide this, and some give fewer than 20 weeks.

The maximum could drop below 20 weeks in California if its unemployme­nt rate were to fall precipitou­sly, although that’s not likely to happen soon, von Wachter said. His report estimates that about 166,000 people, or 6% of those receiving regular state unemployme­nt insurance in October, won’t be eligible for FedEd and face a hard cutoff after December. These are mostly lowearning individual­s who would have met the PEUC requiremen­ts but don’t meet California’s requiremen­ts for FedEd.

The Century Foundation estimated that all of those receiving PEUC will transition to FedEd in California.

The policy lab used “individual level data” in its analysis, von Wachter said, which is one reason its results are different than the Century Foundation’s. This let the lab “make more precise prediction­s on who is currently receiving benefits, exit rates and available benefit durations” and take into account that individual­s “churn” through the unemployme­nt system or get partial UI. “For the same reason, they cannot see which individual­s exhaust PEUC and are not eligible for FedEd,” von Wachter said.

Many people who filed for unemployme­nt in March, when the shelterinp­lace orders took effect, ran out of regular state benefits, moved onto PEUC in September and will move to FedEd in December.

“A second wave of exhaustion­s is expected to crest in midMay,” when these people begin to exhaust their 20 weeks of FedEd, the policy lab report said.

Barbara Squires is in that boat. She has been on unemployme­nt since midMarch, when she lost her parttime job of nine years as a personal assistant to a busy family in Kentfield. She got regular state benefits, followed by the 13week extension, which runs out in midDecembe­r. If she qualifies for FedEd, that should carry her through midMay, when she hopes a vaccine will be available and she can return to work.

If that doesn’t pan out, she’s not sure what she will do.

“I’m single and haven’t saved a lot of money,” she said. “I have a certificat­e of deposit that matures in February. That should help.”

Whether Congress extends benefits past December is anyone’s guess. Conti of the National Employment Law Project doesn’t expect any “honesttogo­d negotiatio­ns until they come back after Thanksgivi­ng.”

Earlier this year, lawmakers failed to extend a third Cares Act program, which added $ 600 a week to federal and state unemployme­nt benefits from April through July. President Trump authorized a separate program called Lost Wages Assistance that added $ 300 a week to benefits for up to six weeks retroactiv­e to late July. That program has expired.

In late September, House Democrats released a somewhat slimmed down version of the Heroes Act, which passed the House in May but went nowhere. The revised plan would revive the $ 600 bonus retroactiv­ely from Sept. 5 through as late as March, according to a summary by Matt Weidinger, an unemployme­nt insurance expert with the American Enterprise Institute. It also would revive the 13week extension and add another 13 weeks and extend Pandemic Unemployme­nt Assistance through January.

On Monday, Presidente­lect Joe Biden urged Congress to pass a relief bill “like the Heroes Act that the House passed six months ago.”

Republican­s have proposed extending the $ 300aweek boost through the end of December, but have not passed a bill extending unemployme­nt, Weidinger said.

Although the Cares Act passed with broad bipartisan support, the economic picture has changed since then. The September unemployme­nt rate was just 3.3% in Nebraska and 11% in California.

“It doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to provide a total package of unemployme­nt benefits in Nebraska that exceeds people’s wages when there is a labor shortage,” Weidinger said. “If you are in Nevada or Hawaii where the tourist industry is reeling, additional help makes some sense. Given that wide array of state experience­s, it makes a lot more sense,” instead of giving everyone up to 72 weeks of unemployme­nt, “to let states figure out what to do with the money.”

 ??  ??
 ?? Chris Carlson / Associated Press ?? Brandon Earl ( right) helps job seeker David Lenus at a driveup job fair in Los Angeles County in May.
Chris Carlson / Associated Press Brandon Earl ( right) helps job seeker David Lenus at a driveup job fair in Los Angeles County in May.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States