San Francisco Chronicle

Facebook’s Australia faceoff could backfire

- By Vlad Savov Vlad Savov is a Bloomberg News writer.

Facebook Inc.’s dramatic move to block Australian news sharing escalated a broader battle against global regulation. That gambit looks likely to backfire.

World leaders were already watching Australian legislatio­n expected to pass next week that will force tech titans Facebook and Alphabet Inc.’s Google to pay publishers for news content. But this week’s abrupt news blackout forced the issue onto the agenda of government­s whose regulators are already ramping up scrutiny of the growing influence of Facebook and similar companies in spheres from media to artificial intelligen­ce.

“There is a lot of world interest in what Australia is doing,” Prime Minister Scott Morrison said on Friday, adding that he discussed Facebook with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Canadian leader Justin Trudeau, French President Emmanuel Macron and the U.K.’s Boris Johnson. “They’re already going down this path.”

Facebook drew a line in the sand precisely because it feared even larger markets would follow Australia’s lead. From Europe to the U.S. and China, government­s are grappling with the issue of how to regulate the world’s largest internet giants, which have recently grown into trilliondo­llar behemoths that help determine what billions of people view, discuss and consume on a daily basis.

The related issue of how to fairly compensate news providers is a thorny challenge given an online community accustomed to free content. Still, the push to redress the monopolyli­ke power of these services appears to be gaining momentum.

“The dominance of a handful of gatekeeper­s online has wreaked havoc on competitio­n, suppressed innovation, and weakened entreprene­urship,” U.S. Rep. David Cicilline, DR.I., said in a statement Friday. He pledged to undertake legislativ­e reforms that “restore competitio­n online.”

The antitrust committee he chairs will be hearing testimony from the CEOs of Facebook, Alphabet and Twitter Inc. in the coming week. Any concession­s made by Facebook in Australia are likely to feed into those deliberati­ons.

The priority of Facebook, whose shares fell 1.5% on Thursday, is now to try and get the legislatio­n amended — especially as politician­s there signal interest in finding common ground. Founder Mark Zuckerberg has met Australian Treasurer Josh Frydenberg twice and will do so again over the weekend.

“We’ll see if there’s a pathway forward,” Frydenberg said in a Nine Network television interview.

Facebook may be counting on the lopsidedne­ss of its Australian presence to wrangle concession­s from Canberra. It has argued that its business gain from news is “minimal” and that articles account for less than 4% of content users see in their news feeds. Still, it’s among the most popular ways Australian­s get their news online.

The mobile Facebook app has been installed close to 27 million times since 2014 and accounted for nearly half of monthly active users among the top five social media apps in the country last year, according to Sensor Tower. That’s a reflection of its global influence, with Facebook the mostused social networking app in all but five of the 84 countries tracked by the research firm.

Globally, tech giants like Facebook find themselves increasing­ly dragged into politicize­d disputes — a trend that’s accelerate­d during the pandemic. A lockeddown world has come to rely on a handful of internet giants more than ever, with many racking up gains at the expense of smaller competitor­s.

In the U.S., Google, Twitter and Facebook have drawn fire for trying to steer an apolitical line through polarized political debates. Twitter has clashed with the Indian government over free speech. Facebook, for its part, took a strong line against Myanmar’s military coup — but only after the Biden administra­tion imposed sanctions on army leaders and publicly rebuked the action.

Old rules focused on regulating pricing power no longer apply, because several of the biggest tech companies have establishe­d trilliondo­llar monopolies by charging consumers next to nothing. Tech giants are increasing­ly assuming powerful positions in finance, advertisin­g, retail and other markets, forcing smaller businesses to rely on their services to reach customers.

The tussle in Australia touches on similarly broad themes. Openweb advocates like Jeff Jarvis have panned the bruteforce approach of the Australian government, while others such as Microsoft Corp. publicly endorsed the moves. Others have caved, if only partially: Google agreed to a threeyear deal with News Corp., and has shown little appetite for following up on a threat to pull its search service from the country.

Facebook opted to escalate the fight, knowing its actions in Australia are likely to have global repercussi­ons. To some, however, it may just come down to dollars and cents for news organizati­ons.

Mike Masnick, founder of Techdirt, warned against conflating broader concerns about the power and influence of tech giants with the dispute over monetizati­on of news.

“The focus on Facebook and Google is misguided,” he said. “News organizati­ons have (mostly, but not entirely) missed the internet boat, and spent years effectivel­y mocking the internet and doing little to prepare for the real shift.

 ??  ?? Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies on Capitol Hill in 2019. Facebook’s decision to block news in Australia in protest of a proposed law may backfire.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies on Capitol Hill in 2019. Facebook’s decision to block news in Australia in protest of a proposed law may backfire.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States