San Francisco Chronicle

Johnson gambles on tax hike to pay for elder care

- By Jill Lawless Jill Lawless is an Associated Press writer.

LONDON — U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced Tuesday how he plans to keep a key election promise to grapple with the rocketing cost of long-term care for Britain’s growing older population. To do it, he broke another election vow: not to raise taxes.

Johnson told lawmakers in the House of Commons that his Conservati­ve government had made the “difficult but responsibl­e” decision to hike taxes in order to raise $50 billion over three years for social care and the overstretc­hed National Health Service. The NHS faces a backlog of millions of delayed appointmen­ts and procedures after 18 months of pandemic pressures.

Johnson said there would be no more “dither and delay” about reforming social care.

That burden of funding care for older, sick and disabled adults in Britain currently falls largely on individual­s, who often have to deplete their savings or sell their homes to pay for it. One in seven people ends up paying more than $138,000, according to the government, which calls the cost of elder care “catastroph­ic and often unpredicta­ble.”

Meanwhile, funding care for the poor who can’t afford it is placing a growing burden on overstretc­hed local authoritie­s.

Johnson announced a 1.25% increase in the National Insurance health payments made by working-age people and their employers, saying the move was “responsibl­e, necessary and fair.”

But it breaks Johnson’s promise in the 2019 election campaign not to hike personal taxes. The increase, which takes effect in April, will cost someone paid $27,500 a year about $248 more on their annual tax bill. High-earners paid $92,000 will pay more than triple that.

Taxes on income from stock dividends will also rise 1.25% to defuse claims that the burden is falling only on working people.

Breaking promises is hardly novel for politician­s, but those enshrined in British parties’ election manifestos have long been considered binding on government­s. Johnson’s plan has alarmed many Conservati­ve lawmakers — both because it involves breaking a firm election commitment and because the burden would fall primarily on workers.

Johnson said breaking an election promise was “not something I do lightly. But a global pandemic was in noone’s manifesto.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States