Santa Cruz Sentinel

Hardships of Biden’s ‘long, hard winter’ already here

- By Catherine Rampell

President-elect Joe Biden recently warned that a “long, hard winter” is coming. In truth, it’s already here, based on a flurry of recent reports measuring economic hardship.

In the two weeks leading up to Thanksgivi­ng, for example, about 12% of adults in the United States, about 26 million people, lived in households that either sometimes or often didn’t have enough to eat in the previous week, according to the Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey. For context, the most comparable pre-pandemic data found that 8 million adults lived in households that didn’t have enough to eat at any point in all of 2019.

American hunger grows increasing­ly visible, too. Here, in the richest country in the world, miles-long lines of cars queued up for food are now regular sights across Texas, New Jersey, Arizona, Ohio and other states.

The Census Bureau survey data also shows that about one-third of adults (35%, or 83 million) said it has been somewhat or very difficult to cover usual expenses such as food, rent, car payments or medical bills during the coronaviru­s pandemic. Roughly the same share expects someone in their household to lose employment income in the next four weeks, with numbers even higher in tourismdep­endent states such as Nevada and Hawaii.

Separately, the Labor Department reported on Thursday that tens of millions of Americans are still filing for unemployme­nt; millions more have either already exhausted their benefits or are set to do so soon, because they’ve been out of work so long.

Small businesses are still struggling, with business activity and employee hours either flator outright declining, based on data from both the Census Bureau and private vendors such as Homebase.

Yes, a coronaviru­s vaccine is - happily - much nearer today than it once was. But we are likely still months away from widespread vaccine distributi­on, and, in the meantime, things may get much worse. For at least three reasons.

First, coronaviru­s infection rates are skyrocketi­ng, reaching new daily highs. This bodes ill not just for lives but for livelihood­s. Even without further “lockdowns” or other government restrictio­ns, consumers and workers will stay away from economic activities that put their health at risk. As long as the virus is spreading unabated, it’s in control of the economy.

Second, federal relief measures keeping families and businesses afloat have been expiring one by one.

Congress has already let lapse the $600 federal weekly unemployme­nt benefit supplement and has stopped accepting new applicatio­ns for the small-business lending program. Next up are two other unemployme­nt benefit expansion programs - one granting additional weeks of benefits, the other expanding eligibilit­y to “gig workers,” freelancer­s and independen­t contractor­s. These programs will end the day after Christmas, robbing an estimated 12 million people of a crucial lifeline.

The coming benefits cliff extends beyond unemployme­nt checks, by the way. The federal eviction moratorium, student-loan and mortgage forbearanc­e programs, and emergency paid family and sick leave programs are slated to expire at year’s end, too.

Third, states and municipali­ties - both red and blue - are broke. Whatever fiscal problems they had before the pandemic have gotten much worse, thanks to lower tax revenue and higher demand for public services.

Unlike the feds, these government­s generally have balancedbu­dget requiremen­ts. As a result, more public-sector layoffs are likely coming down the pike. “Defunding” the police - and, for that matter, the teachers, the firefighte­rs, emergency medical technician­s and other public servants - may soon become a painfully unavoidabl­e reality.

It is long past time for policymake­rs to put country before party and reach a deal that will relieve some, if not all, of the pain. For months, though, lawmakers and the president have dragged their feet. Perhaps they were distracted by buoyant stock markets, or advances in vaccine developmen­t, or the early months of strong (but since flagging) job growth. Or the fact that sure, no amount of government spending can stimulate the economy back to its pre-covid state, so long as the virus still rages.

But the goal right now isn’t really to “stimulate” the economy. It’s to provide humanitari­an relief. It’s to prevent a double-dip recession. And finally, it’s to limit permanent damage to the country’s health and productive capacity from business closures, deteriorat­ing worker skills and children falling behind in school. Whenever a vaccine does become widely available, we want there to still be jobs for workers to return to.

In recent days, a bipartisan group of lawmakers have expressed willingnes­s to pass on limited fiscal relief,in the neighborho­od of $900 billion, to prevent the plunge in benefits expected at year’s end. But,so far, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and outgoing President Donald Trump have refused to back the compromise. Please, dear leaders: Don’t be the grinch who steals Christmas.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States