Santa Cruz Sentinel

Proposed fire safe regulation­s could impact landowners

Those living in communitie­s accessed by narrow, steep, or dead end roads, could face roadblocks to developing

- By Hannah Hagemann hhagemann@santacruzs­entinel.com

SANTA CRUZ >> Regulation­s being considered by The State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection could have significan­t impacts on landowners in Santa Cruz County, and CZU Lightning Complex fire survivors seeking to rebuild.

Communitie­s that do not meet access road, driveway and dead-end road standards laid out in the regulation­s, could be particular­ly stifled in developing new residences or rebuilding post-fire, if the rules are formalized, which advocates are calling cost prohibitiv­e.

Those State Minimum Fire Safe Regulation­s would establish new standards required to develop and rebuild across Santa Cruz County. That includes in areas in State Responsibi­lity Area, such as Felton, Boulder Creek, the Aptos Hills, as well as off the coast in Davenport and Swanton. In those communitie­s, and largely in Santa Cruz County as a whole, the state is responsibl­e for fire suppressio­n and prevention, according to Chris Walters, Santa Cruz County Fire Deputy Fire Marshal.

“These access road and driveway standards… they’re a little more onerous than our local standards,” Walters said.

Property owners who access their community by roads that are at least 14 feet wide, and have more than 13 feet of vertical clearance would likely not be hindered by the regulation­s, as they stand currently.

The rules would not only impact those who live off of narrow roads, but also communitie­s that do not meet steepness, or deadend road thresholds. The draft regulation­s would also impact property owners living on a road that is on a slope steeper than 20%, or on one way road that extends more than one mile.

“The Santa Cruz Mountains are steep and there’s not a lot of extra room to build larger roads. We have dead end roads that go for miles,” Walters said.

In Santa Cruz County, Walters pointed to Whitehouse Canyon Road, Bear Creek Canyon Road, Old Woman’s Creek Road, as well as the Last Chance Road and the unincorpor­ated area of Lompico, as places that could be impacted by the rules, if passed.

“It technicall­y could determine if you could develop your parcel,” Walters said. “That’s a significan­t impact.”

The State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection is holding a fire safe regulation­s workshop Wednesday, where proposed rules that could have significan­t impacts on landowners in Santa Cruz County, and CZU Lightning Complex fire survivors seeking to rebuild, will be discussed.

Those who lost their home in August’s CZU Lightning Complex fire may face additional hurdles to rebuild, if the regulation­s are formalized. In a letter to the Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, the California State Associatio­n of Counties and Rural County Representa­tives of California said the rules will form “no-build” areas across the state.

“The problem with this regulation is it puts the onus of upgrading these roads, on an individual that is building on one of these parcels, so it’s going to make it prohibitiv­ely expensive to even build a home in some of these areas,” Tracy Rhine, a Legislativ­e Advocate with the Rural County Representa­tives of California, said.

Those infrastruc­ture conditions that some fire victims and property owners would need to meet, according to Rhine and other advocates, could further fuel the California’s housing and homelessne­ss crisis.

The associatio­ns are also advocating for the Forestry Board to fully exempt property owners who’ve lost their home in wildland fires, or other natural disasters, from the regulation­s, despite substandar­d road conditions, or other infrastruc­ture issues.

“If you happen to be unlucky and your house burned down, and you are on a road that isn’t the required width, then you cannot rebuild,” Rhine said.

It’s unclear how many properties in Santa Cruz County would be impacted by the proposed rules.

Beyond fire victims seeking to rebuild, the regulation­s could also impact property owners in the Santa Cruz Mountains in other ways, Chris Walters, with Santa Cruz County Fire said. If adopted, the regulation­s would require 100 ft. or more of defensible space around a home — that’s land specifical­ly cultivated to stop or slow wildland fire. Often cultivatin­g this buffer requires clearing brush and vegetation.

Walters said, the debate on the regulation­s exemplify a deeper challenge within the Santa Cruz region and beyond.

“You have two competing interests, the Board of Forestry and Cal Fire, who want to make sure developmen­t within the State Responsibi­lity Areas deals with minimum access standards, water supply, defensible space,” Chris Walters, with Santa Cruz County Fire said. “And then there’s a push from state state and local planning department­s, that more housing is needed… and part of that more housing is developing in State Responsibi­lity Areas and rural areas.”

The proposed fire safe regulation­s are currently in their third draft. The Board of Forestry is seeking public feedback, and hosting workshops where officials and community members alike are invited to attend.

 ?? SHMUEL THALER — SANTA CRUZ SENTINEL FILE ?? Braemoor neighborho­od along Empire Grade suffered damage in the CZU August Lighting Complex fire.
SHMUEL THALER — SANTA CRUZ SENTINEL FILE Braemoor neighborho­od along Empire Grade suffered damage in the CZU August Lighting Complex fire.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States