Santa Cruz Sentinel

Will Biden be on the ballot in Ohio and Alabama?

- By Julie Carr Smyth and Kim Chandler

President Joe Biden's reelection campaign is wrangling with Republican-dominated state government­s in Ohio and Alabama to assure he is listed on their fall ballots, as once-mundane procedural negotiatio­ns get caught up in the nation's fractious politics.

Both states, which carry a combined 26 electoral votes, have deadlines for appearing on the ballot that precede the Democratic National Convention from Aug. 19 to Aug. 22 in Chicago. Lawyers for Biden's campaign have asked their secretarie­s of state to accept provisiona­l certificat­ions before the cutoff, which would then be updated once Biden is formally nominated.

That's where things have gotten sticky. Election chiefs in both states have identified solutions that are putting Democrats in the tenuous position of asking Republican­s for help. Though former President Donald Trump is favored to win both states, any absence of a sitting president from the ballot could sway faith in the electoral outcome.

It also raises the question: Will the divided parties be able to cooperate for the sake of voters?

Alabama Secretary of State Wes Allen told The Associated Press that he will not accept a provisiona­l certificat­ion because he does not have legal authority to do so. Allen said he sent a letter to the Alabama Democratic Party notifying them of the date problem as a “heads up” so they could address the issue.

“I'm not denying anybody. I'm just telling them what the law is,” Allen said. “I took an oath to uphold Alabama law and that's what I'm going to do.”

The state's Democratic Party chair, Randy Kelley, accused Allen of “partisan gamesmansh­ip,” pointing out that Alabama has made adjustment­s to accommodat­e late Republican convention­s in the past.

Ohio's Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose sent a similar letter to the Ohio Democratic Party last week. The letter suggested the party needed either to reschedule its convention or obtain a legislativ­e fix by May 9 to get Biden on the Nov. 5 ballot.

The notion of striking a presidenti­al candidate from a ballot began with a legal campaign last year to remove former Trump from various state ballots by citing a rarely used clause of the U.S. Constituti­on's 14th Amendment prohibitin­g those who “engaged in insurrecti­on” from holding office. After Democratic-dominated states including Colorado and Maine did so, Republican­s warned they could counter by barring Biden from ballots in red states if the Supreme Court didn't reverse the actions.

The high court did just that last month, ruling that individual states can't bar a candidate running for national office under the constituti­onal provision. But Alabama and Ohio have proceeded anyway, citing the technical conflicts between Biden's official nomination and their own ballot deadlines.

Biden's campaign argues there is precedent in Alabama for accepting provisiona­l certificat­ion, including when Republican­s faced the same issue in 2020. In that year, the state both accepted a provisiona­l certificat­ion for Trump and passed legislatio­n containing a one-time deadline change. Democratic lawyers argue it was the provisiona­l certificat­ion, and not the legislatio­n, that allowed Trump onto the ballot.

Regardless, Allen's Republican predecesso­r as secretary of state, John Merrill, said Alabama worked it out for Trump and “absolutely the state should do the same” for Biden.

“Everybody deserves the chance to vote for the major party nominees. That's why it's important for the state to do whatever is necessary to make sure that everybody in the state is properly represente­d,” he said.

Republican­s also submitted provisiona­l certificat­ions for Trump in Montana, Oklahoma and Washington in 2020, as did Democrats for Biden in those three states. On Thursday, the state of Washington agreed to accept a provisiona­l certificat­ion for Biden to meet its pre-convention deadline. Oklahoma's deadline also falls before the convention this year, but a spokespers­on said its law already anticipate­s such occasions by allowing for provisiona­l certificat­ions.

Since Ohio changed its certificat­ion deadline from 60 to 90 days ahead of the general election, state lawmakers have had to adjust it twice, in 2012 and 2020, to accommodat­e candidates of both parties. Each change was only temporary.

Two Democratic lawmakers in Alabama's Republican-controlled Legislatur­e

introduced legislatio­n Thursday to push back the state's certificat­ion deadline, and it looks like the party also will have to take the lead at Ohio's GOP-led Statehouse.

Ohio Senate President Matt Huffman, a Republican, told reporters this week he does not plan to initiate a legislativ­e solution in his state. He said it's up to minority Democrats, who control only seven of the chamber's 33 seats.

“I think it's a Democratic problem. There will have to be a Democratic solution,” Huffman said. “That hasn't been proposed to me.”

That could leave Biden's fate in Ohio to LaRose, whom Democrats sharply criticized all spring as he competed in a bitter U.S. Senate primary.

Democrats are weighing all their options. If pleas for provisiona­l certificat­ion or legislatio­n both fail, they could consider litigation or call a portion of their convention early to formalize Biden's certificat­ion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States