Santa Fe New Mexican

Senate Dems back end to campaign fund limits

Lawmakers argue change will help fight ‘dark money’

- By Steve Terrell Contact Steve Terrell at sterrell@sfnewmexic­an.com. Read his political blog at http://tinyurl.com/ Roundhouse­roundup.

Lawmakers argue changing the law will help fight the use of “dark money” in campaigns.

Six years ago, the state Legislatur­e passed and the governor signed a bill that establishe­d limits on campaign contributi­ons in statewide and legislativ­e races in New Mexico. On Tuesday, a Senate committee voted to abolish those limits.

With bipartisan support, the Senate Rules Committee passed Senate Bill 689, sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Michael Sanchez, D-Belen.

Sanchez said in an interview after the vote that he introduced the bill in an effort to get contributo­rs to give directly to candidates’ campaigns rather than to independen­t expenditur­e groups, such as super PACS and nonprofits, which are neither subject to contributi­on limits nor required to disclose the names of donors.

Sanchez noted the campaign contributi­on limits were passed before the U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which found limitation­s on contributi­ons to independen­t expenditur­e groups are an unconstitu­tional restrictio­n on freedom of speech.

“The intent was good before the Supreme Court said that corporatio­ns were citizens,” Sanchez said. “I think this will level the playing field.”

Sen. Jacob Candelaria, D-Albuquerqu­e, who also voted for the bill, said doing away with contributi­on limits could make elections more transparen­t. “Right now, in a post-Citizens United World, there’s an incentive to give dark money.”

Only one Rules Committee member voted against Sanchez’s bill. Sen. Sander Rue, R-Albuquerqu­e, told a reporter he believes Sanchez’s bill, introduced late in the session, was just to “make a point.”

Rue said doing away with campaign contributi­on limits would not stop “dark money.” Said the senator: “I want to require all these groups to report their contributi­ons. Full disclosure is the only thing that solves the problem.”

Candelaria agreed with Rue that the independen­t expenditur­e groups should be required to report their donors.

He said that in addition to Sanchez’s bill, the Legislatur­e also should pass a bill aimed at requiring independen­t expenditur­e groups that buy advertisin­g and mailers during New Mexico election campaigns to disclose their contributo­rs. Such a bill — House Bill 278, sponsored by Rep. Jim Smith, R-Sandia Park, and Sen. Peter Wirth, D-Santa Fe — is winding its way through House committees.

Smith’s bill would double the limits for contributi­ons in legislativ­e primary election races — to $5,000 from $2,500 — and increase contributi­on limits by the same amount for general election races. That’s the same limit set for statewide candidates, including those running for governor.

The executive director of an organizati­on that long has advocated for campaign finance reform is not enamored with Sanchez’s bill.

“Common Cause New Mexico worked for years to get contributi­on limits in place back in 2009, and we do not support repealing them,” Viki Harrison said Tuesday.

Only four states do not have any campaign spending limits, according to the National Conference of State Legislatur­es.

Although the New Mexico law that establishe­d campaign limits was passed in 2009, it didn’t go into effect until after the 2010 election.

The reason for the delay was that at the time the bill was being debated in the Legislatur­e, Lt. Gov. Diane Denish already had raised more than $1 million for her 2010 gubernator­ial race — far more than anyone else from either party. Denish, a Democrat, lost in 2010 to Republican Susana Martinez.

Last year’s election was the first governor’s race in which campaign contributi­on limits were in place.

SB 689 goes next to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States