Santa Fe New Mexican

Tensions rise as tribes move to block a pipeline

- By Jack Healy

Horseback riders, their faces streaked in yellow and black paint, led the procession out of their tepee-dotted camp. Two hundred people followed, making their daily walk a mile up a rural highway to a patch of prairie grass and excavated dirt that has become a new kind of battlefiel­d, between a pipeline and American Indians who say it will threaten water supplies and sacred lands.

The Texas-based company building the Dakota Access pipeline, Energy Transfer Partners, calls the project a major step toward the United States’ weaning itself off foreign oil. The company says the nearly 1,170-mile buried pipeline will infuse millions of dollars into local economies and is safer than trucks and train cars that can topple and spill and crash and burn.

But the people who stood at the gates of a constructi­on site where crews had been building an access road toward the pipeline viewed the project as a wounding intrusion onto lands where generation­s of their ancestors hunted bison, gathered water and were born and buried, long before treaties and fences stamped a different order onto the Plains.

People have been gathering since April, but as hundreds more poured in over the past two weeks, confrontat­ions began rising among protesters, sheriff ’s officers and constructi­on workers with the pipeline company. Local officials are struggling to handle hundreds of demonstrat­ors filling the roads to protest and camp out in once empty grassland about an hour south of Bismarck, the state capital.

More than 20 people have been arrested on charges including disorderly conduct and trespassin­g onto the constructi­on site. The pipeline company says it was forced to shut down constructi­on this month after protesters threatened its workers and threw bottles and rocks at contractor­s’ vehicles.

Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier of Morton County, who has led the law enforcemen­t response, said at a news conference that he had received reports of weapons and gunshots around the demonstrat­ion, and that protesters were getting ready to throw pipe bombs at a line of officers standing between a rally and the constructi­on site.

Leaders from the Standing Rock Sioux tribe, whose reservatio­n lies just south of the pipeline’s path, say the protests are peaceful. Weapons, drugs and alcohol are prohibited from the protest camp. Children march in the daily demonstrat­ions. The leaders believed the reports of pipe bombs were a misinterpr­etation of their calls for demonstrat­ors to get out their wooden chanupa pipes — which have deep spiritual importance — and pass them through the crowd.

The conflict may reach a crucial moment on Wednesday in a federal court hearing. The tribe has sued to block the pipeline and plans to ask a judge in Washington to effectivel­y halt constructi­on.

The pipeline runs overwhelmi­ngly along private land, but where it crosses bodies of water, federal rules come into play and federal approvals are required.

The tribe says the pipeline’s route under the Missouri River near here could threaten its water supplies if the pipeline leaks or breaks, and it says the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers failed to do proper cultural and historical reviews before granting federal approvals for the pipeline.

“This is our homeland,” said Phyllis Young, a member of the Standing Rock Sioux. “We are Dakota. Dakota means friend or ally. Dakota Access has taken our name.”

In legal filings, the corps rejects those claims. It says it consulted extensivel­y with tribes, including the Standing Rock Sioux, and it says that tribe has failed to describe specific cultural sites that would be damaged by the pipeline. Energy Transfer Partners says it has the necessary state and federal permits and hopes to finish constructi­on by the end of the year. The pipeline’s route starts in the Bakken oil fields of western North Dakota and ends in Illinois.

With the fate of the land here and this $3.7 billion project in the air, people here have decided to take action. They are occupying the prairie.

Echoing protests against the now-scuttled Keystone XL pipeline, environmen­tal activists and other tribes from the Dakotas, the rest of the Great Plains and the Pacific Northwest have been arriving to camp in the open fields and protest near the parcel where the pipeline company has secured an agreement with the landowner to build.

The protesters sleep in tents and tepees, cook food in open-air kitchens and share stories and strategies around evening campfires. There is even a day care. At morning meetings, speakers warn parents to keep their children away from the Missouri River at sunset, and remind one another they are camped out in prayer.

“It’s a major movement in Indian country,” said CJ Clifford, a member of the Oglala Lakota, who drove up from the Pine Ridge Reservatio­n in South Dakota. He saw the protests as part of a historical continuum reaching to Little Bighorn. This battle, he said, was being waged peacefully.

For many, the effort was about reclaiming a stake in ancestral lands that had been whittled down since the 1800s, treaty by broken treaty.

“Lands were constantly getting reduced, shaken up,” said Dave Archambaul­t II, the tribal chairman of the Standing Rock Sioux. “I could give you a list of every wrongdoing this government did to our people. All of that is frustratio­n pent up, and it’s being recognized.” He added, “It’s a tipping point for our nations.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States