Santa Fe New Mexican

‘Bathroom bills’ flounder across U.S.

Fears of backlash fuel high-level opposition

- By David Crary The Associated Press

Bills to curtail transgende­r people’s access to public restrooms are pending in about a dozen states, but even in conservati­ve bastions such as Texas and Arkansas they may be doomed by high-powered opposition.

The bills have taken on a new significan­ce this week following the decision by President Donald Trump’s administra­tion to revoke an Obama-era federal directive instructin­g public schools to let transgende­r students use bathrooms and locker rooms of their chosen gender. Many conservati­ve leaders hailed the assertions by top Trump appointees that the issue was best handled at the state and local level.

Yet at the state level, bills that would limit transgende­r bathroom access are flounderin­g even though nearly all have surfaced in Republican-controlled legislatur­es that share common ground politicall­y with Trump. In none of the states with pending bills does passage seem assured; there’s been vigorous opposition from business groups and a notable lack of support from several GOP governors.

The chief reason, according to transgende­r-rights leaders, is the backlash that hit North Carolina after its legislatur­e approved a bill requiring transgende­r people to use public restrooms that correspond to the sex on their birth certificat­es. Several major sports organizati­ons shifted events away from North Carolina, and businesses such as PayPal decided not to expand in the state. In November, Republican Pat McCrory became the only incumbent governor to lose in the general election.

“We don’t need that in Arkansas,” said that state’s GOP governor, Asa Hutchinson, earlier this month. “If there’s a North Carolina-type bill, then I want the Legislatur­e not to pass it.”

North Carolina’s experience also has been evoked in Texas, where a “bathroom bill” known as Senate Bill 6 is being championed by GOP Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick. Business groups and LGBT-rights supporters have warned that passage of the North Carolina-style bill could cost Texas many millions of dollars, as well as the opportunit­y to host future pro sports championsh­ips.

In Virginia, South Dakota and Wyoming, bills targeting transgende­r people already have died this year for lack of high-level support. The South Dakota bill, opposed by GOP Gov. Dennis Daugaard, would have required public school students to use the locker rooms and shower rooms matching their gender at birth.

In several other states, such as Kansas and Kentucky, bathroom bills remain alive but are gaining little traction. Kentucky’s GOP Gov. Matt Bevin, though a staunch social conservati­ve, has dismissed the proposal as unnecessar­y government intrusion.

“Is there anyone you know in Kentucky who has trouble going to the bathroom?” he asked.

In Tennessee, two lawmakers promoting a bathroom bill abruptly ended a news conference last week when it was interrupte­d by protesters, one wearing a T-shirt reading “You can pee next to me.”

Major Tennessee businesses have joined forces to oppose the bill. And on Thursday, Lt. Gov. Randy McNally said the bill was no longer needed because of the Trump administra­tion’s decision to revoke the directive on transgende­r students’ rights.

There’s a bathroom bill pending in Missouri, where an identical proposal didn’t even receive a hearing last year. Wisconsin’s GOP-controlled Legislatur­e also rejected a bathroom bill last session; its sponsor promises to bring it back this year even though GOP leaders have not made it a priority.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States