Santa Fe New Mexican

Pentagon calls for increased U.S. participat­ion in Syria

American troops would not be involved in ground combat in assault on embattled city of Raqqa

- By Karen DeYoung and Liz Sly

WASHINGTON — A Pentagon plan for the coming assault on Raqqa, the Islamic State capital in Syria, calls for significan­t U.S. military participat­ion, including increased Special Operations forces, attack helicopter­s and artillery, and arms supplies to the main Syrian Kurdish and Arab fighting force on the ground, according to U.S. officials.

The military’s favored option among several variations currently under White House review, the proposal would ease a number of restrictio­ns on U.S. activities imposed during former President Barack Obama’s administra­tion.

Officials involved in the planning have proposed lifting a cap on the size of the U.S. military contingent in Syria, currently numbering about 500 Special Operations trainers and advisers to the combined Syrian Democratic Forces, or SDF. While the Americans would not be directly involved in ground combat, the proposal would allow them to work closer to the front line and would delegate more decisionma­king authority down the military line from Washington.

President Donald Trump, who campaigned on a pledge to expand the fight against the militants in Syria, Iraq and beyond, received the plan Monday after giving the Pentagon 30 days to prepare it.

But in a conflict where nothing has been as simple as anticipate­d, the Raqqa offensive has already sparked new alliances. In just the past two days, U.S. forces intended for the Raqqa battle have had to detour to a town in northern Syria to head off a confrontat­ion between two American allied forces — Turkish and Syrian Kurdish fighters. There, they have found themselves effectivel­y side by side with Russian and Syrian government forces with the same apparent objective.

Approval of the Raqqa plan would effectivel­y shut the door on Turkey’s demands that Syrian Kurds, considered terrorists by Ankara, be denied U.S. equipment and kept out of the upcoming offensive. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has said that arming and including the Kurdish People’s Protection Units, or YPG, in the operation is unacceptab­le and has vowed to move his own troops and Turkish-allied Syrian rebel forces toward Raqqa.

U.S. officials, some of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity about the still-secret planning, believe Erdogan’s tough talk is motivated primarily by domestic politics, specifical­ly a desire to bolster prospects for an April 16 nationwide referendum that would transform Turkey’s governing system to give more power to the presidency.

Lt. Gen. Stephen Townsend, the Baghdad-based U.S. commander of the anti-Islamic State coalition, told reporters Wednesday that there was “zero evidence” that the YPG was a threat to Turkey. With some apparent exasperati­on, Townsend called on all anti-Islamic State forces in northern Syria to stop fighting among themselves and concentrat­e on the best way to beat the militants.

In his final days in office, Obama approved plans to send two or three Apache attack helicopter­s to the Syrian theater but deferred approval of arming the Kurds as part of the SDF. Rather than moving immediatel­y on the plan already in place, Trump at the end of January ordered the Pentagon to draw up new options by the end of February.

The combined Syrian Arab Kurdish force, now numbering more than 50,000, has moved steadily to within less than six miles of the outskirts of Raqqa in an isolation phase that is expected to be completed in the coming weeks.

Rather than a wholesale revision, the new proposal calls for increased U.S. participat­ion, with more personnel and equipment and less-restrictiv­e rules. As they have in support of the Iraqi military in Mosul, U.S. fixed-wing aircraft and attack helicopter­s would actively back the ground force. U.S. owned and operated artillery would be moved into Syria to pound the militants from afar, while more Special Operations troops would move closer to the front lines — requiring more U.S. military assets to protect them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States