Santa Fe New Mexican

Trump putting planet at risk

-

That didn’t take long. Only 10 weeks into his presidency, and at great risk to future generation­s, Donald Trump has ordered the demolition of most of President Barack Obama’s policies to combat climate change by reducing emissions from fossil fuels.

The assault began with Trump’s pledge in Detroit to roll back fuel efficiency standards for cars and trucks, continued with a stingy budget plan that would end funding for climaterel­ated scientific programs and reached an unhappy apex Tuesday with an executive order that, among other things, would rescind the centerpiec­e of Obama’s clean power strategy, a rule that would shut down hundreds of old coal-fired power plants and freeze the constructi­on of new ones.

None of this was unexpected from a man who has described climate change as a hoax invented by the Chinese to destroy U.S. industry and who has surrounded himself with Cabinet officers and assistants who know or care little about the issue of global warming and its consequenc­es — and who, in many cases, owe their political success to the largess of the oil, gas and coal companies.

Still, the gathering at the Environmen­tal Protection Agency on Tuesday was deeply dismaying — and not only because of Trump’s tired complaints about job-killing regulation­s. Or his false promises of more jobs for coal workers whose industry is in irreversib­le decline because of cheaper natural gas and the tripling in capacity since 2008 of cleaner energy sources like wind and solar.

It was dismaying also because it repudiated the rock-solid scientific consensus that without swift action the consequenc­es of climate change — rising seas, more devastatin­g droughts, widespread species extinction — are likely to get steadily worse.

It was dismaying because it reaffirmed the administra­tion’s support for older, dirtier energy sources when all the economic momentum and new investment lies with newer, cleaner forms of energy.

It was dismaying because it flew in the face of widespread public support for environmen­tal protection — including the pleas of the executives of hundreds of major U.S. corporatio­ns who fear that without energy innovation their costs will rise and their competitiv­e edge over foreign companies will be lost.

Perhaps most important, Trump’s ignorance has stripped America of its hard-won role as a global leader on climate issues.

There was some relief that Trump did not use the occasion to withdraw the United States from the Paris agreement concluded in December 2015, when 195 nations came together for the first time in a collective effort to reduce greenhouse gases, in large part because of the tireless efforts of Obama and his secretary of state, John Kerry, to bring the Chinese and India along.

But the truth is that Trump has, for all practical purposes, repudiated Paris. The initiative­s that he threatens to dismantle are the very ones that support Obama’s expansive pledge in Paris to reduce America’s greenhouse gas emissions by more than one-quarter below 2005 levels by 2025.

Without them, the United States will have neither the tools nor the credibilit­y to lead the world on emissions reduction, and surely the leaders of China and India and the rest of the world are smart enough to see this.

This raises two very real dangers. Either other big countries also pull out of the agreement. Or they decide to seize the initiative on clean energy sources, which would be good for the climate but bad for U.S. industry.

Are there ways to avert this madness? Yes. Trump’s orders will not take effect right away. The EPA will need a year or longer to develop a replacemen­t for the Clean Power Plan. Progressiv­e states like California and New York almost surely will proceed with their own initiative­s to reduce greenhouse gases. And then there is public opinion.

It punished the Republican­s severely in 1994 when Newt Gingrich and his allies tried to roll back environmen­tal laws.

It punished them again in 2008 after eight years of denialism and prevaricat­ion on climate change under George W. Bush and his fossil fuel acolyte, Dick Cheney.

There is time enough before Trump’s ignorance translates into actual policy for the public to make its opposition to this anti-science agenda felt again.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States