Confirmation could be easier for Trump’s picks for federal bench
GOP weighs changing custom allowing Dems to block judicial choices
WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans are threatening to change a custom that allows Democratic senators to block some judicial choices from their states, in an effort to speed along a conservative transformation of the federal judiciary.
Leaders are considering a significant change to the Senate’s “blue slip” practice, which holds that judicial nominations will not proceed unless the nominee’s home-state senators signal their consent to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Republicans say they would make the change if Democrats throw up blanket opposition to President Donald Trump’s nominees.
Adherence to the custom has waxed and waned, depending on the views of Senate leaders. But the rule was strictly observed during the Obama administration, and GOP opposition to President Barack Obama’s nominees partly explains why Trump entered office with more than 120 judicial vacancies to fill.
Removing the blue-slip obstacle would make it much easier for Trump’s choices to be confirmed. Although Trump and Senate Republicans have clashed early in his presidency, they agree on the importance of putting conservatives on the federal bench.
Senate Republicans changed the chamber’s filibuster rule in April to confirm Neil Gorsuch as a Supreme Court justice and applauded Trump’s first round of nominations for federal circuit courts of appeals and district courts. His choices were drawn in part from the recommendations of conservative groups such as the Federalist Society and the Heritage Foundation.
The Senate on Thursday filled the first federal appeals court vacancy in more than a year, promoting a trial court judge who is close to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
U.S. District Judge Amul Thapar of Kentucky was confirmed for the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals by a 52-44 vote. Thapar was the first judge nominated by Trump to a district or appeals court. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit covers Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee.
Conservative groups have urged McConnell and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, to loosen the blue-slip rules — especially on nominees to regional appellate courts — and Republicans have warned Democrats that uncompromising opposition to Trump’s nominees could trigger a change.
“Everybody agrees that blue slips on federal district judges are appropriate where the districts are contained within a state and that’s been the tradition,” said Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the chamber’s second-ranking Republican. “My sense is that we’re going to establish a pattern where a blue slip at the circuit court level is an expression of advice, but is not determinative as to whether that judge will be confirmed or not.”
Democrats say that would be a substantial reworking of the current rules and inconsistent with Grassley’s pledge to retain the blue-slip process no matter which party captured the White House last year.
“Eliminating the blue slip is essentially a move to end cooperation between the executive and legislative branch on judicial nominees, allowing nominees to be hand-picked by right-wing groups,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein of Claifornia, the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, wrote in a memo this week.
She pointed out that the vacancy for which Thapar is nominated exists only because McConnell refused to return a blue slip for Obama’s nominee, Kentucky Supreme Court Justice Lisabeth Tabor Hughes. The seat has been vacant since 2013, and Tabor Hughes never received a hearing because blue slips were not returned.
Now, liberal groups that denounced Republican stalling over Obama nominees -— his picks languished longer before action than did President George W. Bush’s — are urging Democratic senators to use blue slips to block Trump nominees.
Until the 1950s, objections by home-state senators did not hang up judicial nominations, according to a Congressional Research Service report. But during the civil rights movement, Southern lawmakers demanded more say over the judges from their states and succeeded in winning more deference.
Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., blasted Republicans for departing from tradition, saying in a statement, “The Constitution requires the advice and consent of the Senate, not right wing interest groups, on the president’s judicial nominees.”
But there’s very little that Democrats can do to stop Trump from nominating conservative judges and the Republican-controlled Senate from confirming them. It was Democrats, when they controlled the Senate in 2013, who changed the rules barring filibusters on judicial nominees, which required 60 votes to move forward on a nomination.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., a former U.S. attorney and state attorney general who is among the most liberal members of the Judiciary Committee, said he doubts that Grassley “would want to dismantle that longstanding Senate prerogative just to cater to the extremist impulses of this particular administration.”
Trump has nominated 10 judges in addition to Thapar, and two of them are from states represented in the Senate by Democrats. Minnesota Supreme Court Justice David Stras and Michigan Supreme Court Justice Joan Larsen were on Trump’s list of potential U.S. Supreme Court picks. Stras is nominated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, and Larsen to the 6th Circuit.
Michigan’s Democratic senators, Debbie Stabenow and Gary Peters, said they were “informed” of Trump’s intention to nominate Larsen and have made no judgment about her. Minnesota’s Democratic senators, Amy Klobuchar and Al Franken, also have been noncommittal about Stras.
“It’s customary that the blueslip process applies equally to both district and circuit court nominees,” Franken said, adding, “The committee should continue this custom and not change it simply because there’s a new president in the White House.”