Santa Fe New Mexican

Time to act: Find a dangerous buzz

-

Last month, a 16-year-old tragically lost his life after consuming an energy drink, a soda and a latte — drinks routinely consumed by and often intensivel­y marketed to youths — all within a few hours. The boy’s heart simply couldn’t cope with the amount of caffeine in the beverages, according to the coroner.

The teen wasn’t the first to pay a terrible price for drinking popular beverages that are commonly (but mistakenly) considered safe, but he should be the last. The government must take steps to reduce caffeine levels allowed in energy drinks; to clearly provide recommenda­tions on safe caffeine consumptio­n for children and adolescent­s; to ban the marketing of energy drinks to young people of all ages; and to help educate the public on the health risks of high caffeine intake.

Caffeine is a strong and potentiall­y dangerous stimulant, particular­ly for children and adolescent­s. When people think of the drug, they generally think of coffee. But less widely known is that a single serving of an energy drink (Monster Energy, Red Bull, 5-hour Energy and Rockstar, to name a few) may contain many times more caffeine than a cup of coffee.

Making matters worse, consumers do not know the risks of the high levels of caffeine in an energy drink. Nutrition labels are not legally required to include informatio­n about caffeine content — a critical and potentiall­y life-threatenin­g omission. Many drink manufactur­ers have initiated voluntary labeling initiative­s, but they are not consistent­ly applied and do not provide adequate informatio­n to ensure consumers appropriat­ely interpret the level of risk a beverage presents. Labels are a first step — necessary, but not sufficient.

Unlike coffee, energy drinks are widely marketed to adolescent­s, putting them at risk of extreme caffeine overload with potentiall­y devastatin­g cardiovasc­ular and neurologic­al consequenc­es. From 2005-11, energy drink-related emergency-room visits rose from 1,494 visits to 20,783 visits. This included high rates of unintentio­nal exposure in children younger than 6.

In 2011, the American Academy of Pediatrics released a report on the appropriat­eness of sports and energy drinks for children and adolescent­s, concluding that “energy drinks pose potential health risks because of the stimulants they contain, and should never be consumed by children and adolescent­s.” In 2013, the American Medical Associatio­n adopted a policy supporting a ban on the marketing of energy drinks to those under 18, arguing that energy drinks could lead to a host of issues in young people, including heart problems.

Still, energy drink consumptio­n has skyrockete­d in recent years, even as soda consumptio­n has begun to decline. Given the danger energy drinks pose to children and teens with no potential benefit to their health or well-being, the marketing and advertisin­g of these products to young people must stop. We applaud efforts by Sens. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., and Edward Markey, D-Mass., to move in this direction, and expect more of their colleagues in Congress to follow suit.

Because manufactur­ers add caffeine to energy drinks, it is subject to regulation by the Food and Drug Administra­tion as a food additive. In fact, the FDA has recognized the risks of high caffeine consumptio­n and imposed a 71-milligram limit on the amount of caffeine that may be added to a 12-ounce soda.

However, no limits are imposed on the caffeine content of energy drinks, and containers easily can hold 200 milligrams to 300 milligrams or more. There is no justificat­ion for this regulatory distinctio­n. Children and adolescent­s drinking energy drinks need as much protection as those drinking Coke and Pepsi.

Young people ages 12 through 17 — almost one-third of whom consume energy drinks regularly — are entitled to informatio­n that could save their lives.

The FDA’s limits on added caffeine in colas should be applied to energy drinks, and the amount of caffeine added to an energy drink should be listed on its nutrition label, including a distinct front-of-package warning for drinks with caffeine levels greater than those allowed in soda.

Informatio­n based on scientific testing should also be made available on the effects of energy drink additives, such as guarana and taurine, that can increase the potency and increase the effects of caffeine.

As sales of energy drinks rise every year, the need to act becomes even more critical. Steps to protect the health of our children are both feasible and necessary. The problem has been identified. Now is the time to act.

Pat Crawford is senior director of research at the University of California’s Nutrition Policy Institute and an adjunct professor at the University of California at Berkeley. Wendi Gosliner is a project scientist at the Nutrition Policy Institute. They wrote this commentary for The Washington Post.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States