Santa Fe New Mexican

Feds put brakes on methane regulation

BLM drilling rule on hold indefinite­ly; EPA declares two-year stay for review

- By Rebecca Moss

The Trump administra­tion has dealt its largest blow yet to Obama-era oil and gas drilling regulation­s, announcing one rule requiring operators to curb methane pollution won’t take effect until at least 2019 and that another methane rule is being suspended indefinite­ly.

The U.S. Department of the Interior, which oversees the Bureau of Land Management, published notice Wednesday that a methane rule for drilling on federal and tribal land will be put on hold until litigation challengin­g the regulation has been resolved in court.

The notice came less than 24 hours after the Environmen­tal Protection Agency announced that its implementa­tion of a methane rule for operators on private land will be stayed for two years to give the agency time to reconsider the regulation and solicit additional public comment. The EPA had issued a 90-day hold in June.

The administra­tion’s actions on the methane rules are significan­t to New

Mexico because of the state’s large oil and gas industry and because a large cloud of methane, which has been tied to climate change and public health damage, hangs over the Four Corners region.

Oil and gas industry groups have fought the methane rules in court and in the political arena, saying the regulation­s would kill jobs and stymie the economy.

“Both rules vastly exceeded federal authority. … The actions today by the agencies are a first step to correcting that federal regulatory overreach,” said Kathleen Sgamma, president of the Western Energy Alliance.

Sgamma said the oil and gas industry has reduced methane emissions by 19 percent while increasing production by more than 50 percent in the past three decades. “We achieved that success by technologi­cal innovation, without federal regulation,” she said.

Environmen­tal groups criticized the administra­tion for bending to the will of the fossil fuel industry at the expense of public health and the environmen­t, calling it a new low for the government of President Donald Trump.

“Suspending this rule will deprive our schools of critical royalty revenue and lead to dirty air, increasing asthma rates amongst our children,” said James Jimenez, executive director of New Mexico Voices for Children.

Supporters of the rules have said the requiremen­ts that drillers on government land capture more methane gas, which is the main constituen­t of natural gas, would lead to more royalties being paid to states and the federal government.

In the Federal Register notice of its action, the EPA said, “The environmen­tal health or safety risk addressed by this action may have a disproport­ionate effect on children. … Any impacts on children’s health caused by the delay in the rule will be limited, because the length of the proposed stay is limited.”

The EPA said it will put the rule on hold for two years to give the agency “sufficient time to propose, take public comment, and issue a final action” in its review of the regulation. The EPA received 900,000 public comments before the rule was completed in 2016.

The EPA said the stay will give the agency time to answer questions that have been raised since the rule was made final and “provide clarity and certainty for the public and the regulated community.”

After the methane rule for the Bureau of Land Management was issued by the Obama administra­tion in the fall, oil and gas groups and some Western states filed suit challengin­g the regulation, arguing the rule is arbitrary, capricious and exceeds the agency’s authority.

The Interior Department, in its Federal Register notice, said the methane rule, which had been set to take effect in January, will be put on hold until the litigation is resolved. The agency said drillers should not have to comply with the regulation given the legal uncertaint­y.

The House voted this year to use the Congressio­nal Review Act to repeal the BLM rule, but the Senate narrowly rejected the repeal.

Trump has ordered agencies to review all regulation­s that “potentiall­y burden the developmen­t or use of domestical­ly produced energy resources and appropriat­ely suspend, revise, or rescind those that unduly burden the developmen­t of domestic energy resources.”

Alexandra Merlino, executive director of the Partnershi­p for Responsibl­e Business, said that the “BLM should respect the Senate’s vote and the will of the people by upholding the rule.”

But Robert McEntyre, a spokesman for the New Mexico Oil and Gas Associatio­n, said, “Operators and producers in New Mexico have confidence moving forward for the next two years that this is not something that will hamstring production and stand in the way of developing resources in a safe and responsibl­e way.”

Environmen­tal groups last week filed a lawsuit challengin­g the stay of the EPA’s methane rule.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States