Santa Fe New Mexican

Slashing Medicaid to cut millionair­es’ taxes

-

Despite slight difference­s, the health care legislatio­n under considerat­ion in the Senate retains the same sickening goal of its House counterpar­t: cutting taxes for millionair­es, billionair­es and big corporatio­ns at the expense of working families. These bills are not about ensuring the health of working families; they are designed to increase the wealth of the lucky few.

Twenty-two million people would lose health coverage under the Senate plan, according to the nonpartisa­n Congressio­nal Budget Office. The savings would pay for tax cuts of $570 billion, mostly for highincome individual­s and big health care companies. Both the Senate and House bills are meant to replace the Affordable Care Act (also known as “Obamacare”), which extended health coverage to 20 million previously uninsured Americans.

The Senate bill slashes Medicaid by $772 billion over 10 years. In 2026, 15 million fewer Americans would be covered — mostly people with disabiliti­es, kids from working families and the elderly poor.

Medicaid is central to America’s health care system. It pays for half the nation’s births and nearly twothirds of all nursing home care. The Senate plan also punishes patients by reducing subsidies to help them buy private insurance. For example, the average monthly premium for a 64-year-old making $56,800 a year will increase by up to $13,700 compared to what they will pay under the Affordable Care Act. Such price hikes will put health care coverage out of reach for 7 million. Especially hard hit will be older Americans living in rural areas.

While those who are most vulnerable lose health coverage, the wealthy and corporatio­ns reap huge tax savings. Millionair­es would get a tax break averaging $50,000 a year. Each of the 400 richest families in America would receive an average annual tax cut of $7 million.

Health care corporatio­ns share in the tax-cut spoils, too. Insurers will get $145 billion over 10 years — as well as a change in tax rules to let them overpay their top executives at taxpayer expense. Prescripti­on drug companies will get more than $20 billion in tax cuts over the next decade.

Health insurers and pharmaceut­ical firms don’t need tax cuts. Profits of the eight biggest health insurance companies jumped by a third over a recent four-year span, to more than $25 billion. Last year, the top 10 drug companies had combined earnings of more than $83 billion.

Drug company profits keep getting bigger because drug companies keep price gouging. Over the past 10 years, drug prices have grown eight times faster than the general rate of inflation. Drug companies also stash hundreds of billions of dollars in profits offshore to dodge U.S. taxes.

Rich people never have to worry about losing their health care. They also benefit from a tax code that favors wealth over work: Investment income in the form of dividends and capital gains is taxed at a lower rate than a lot of wage and salary income. The ACA addresses some of that injustice by placing a small tax on investment income for people making over $250,000 a year, using the revenue to expand health care coverage to millions of lower-income Americans.

The Senate bill would reverse this advance, handing the wealthy a tax cut of over $170 billion over 10 years while underminin­g health care for working families. The Senate plan would also weaken Medicare by repealing an extra payroll tax on employees making over a quartermil­lion dollars a year. This surtax has strengthen­ed the Medicare hospital fund — eliminatin­g it will shorten by two years its ability to pay full benefits. But the wealthy will get a $59 billion tax cut.

Senators face a fundamenta­l choice. Will they back a plan that imperils the health care of millions of hardworkin­g Americans to give hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts to the wealthy and corporatio­ns? Or will they reject this assault not only on our nation’s health care but on its core values of fairness, compassion and common sense?

Frank Clemente is executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness in Washington, D.C.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States