Santa Fe New Mexican

White House mulls easier deportatio­n guidelines

Under proposal, agency can seek expedited removal of undocument­ed immigrants

- By Abigail Hauslohner and David Nakamura

The Trump administra­tion is weighing a new policy to dramatical­ly expand the Department of Homeland Security’s powers to expedite the deportatio­ns of some illegal immigrants.

Since 2004, the agency has been authorized to bypass immigratio­n courts only for immigrants who had been living in the country illegally for less than two weeks and were apprehende­d within 100 miles of the border.

Under the proposal, the agency would be empowered to seek the expedited removal of illegal immigrants apprehende­d anywhere in the United States who cannot prove they have lived in the country continuous­ly for more than 90 days, according to a 13-page internal agency memo obtained by The Washington Post.

The new guidelines, if enacted, would represent a major expansion of the agency’s authority to speed up deportatio­ns under President Donald Trump, who has made border security a top priority.

Two administra­tion officials confirmed that the proposed new policy, which would not require congressio­nal

approval, is under review. The memo was circulated at the White House in May, and DHS is reviewing comments on the document from the Office of Management and Budget, according to one administra­tion official familiar with the process who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Immigrant rights advocates denounced the proposed expansion of the expedited deportatio­n authority, warning that the policy would strip more immigrants of due-process rights to seek asylum or other legal protection­s that would allow them to remain in the country.

“This is a radical departure from current policy and practice, which takes one giant step towards implementi­ng Trump’s deportatio­n force across the nation,” said Marielena Hincapié, executive director of the National Immigratio­n Law Center.

DHS officials disputed such characteri­zations, saying that the new policy would simply allow the agency to take advantage of its discretion that has been permitted under federal law for more than two decades.

In 1996, Congress authorized the use of expedited deportatio­ns for illegal immigrants apprehende­d anywhere in the country who could not prove they had been physically present in the country two years before their apprehensi­on. The powers were used almost exclusivel­y at the border, however, and in 2004 the George W. Bush administra­tion issued guidelines stipulatin­g that the expedited removals could be used for those apprehende­d within 100 miles of the border who had lived in the country fewer than 14 days.

The use of expedited removals rose substantia­lly in the decade after the administra­tion implemente­d its guidelines, spiking from about 50,000 immigrants in 2004 to 193,000 in 2013 — about 44 percent of the total number of people deported that year, according to the American Immigratio­n Council.

In a pair of immigratio­n executive orders signed in January, Trump sought to expand the use of expedited deportatio­ns, as one of several strategies to crack down on illegal immigratio­n. Trump also has called for an additional 10,000 immigratio­n agents and 5,000 border agents, penalties for sanctuary jurisdicti­ons that refuse to cooperate with immigratio­n agents, a “big, beautiful” wall along the U.S.Mexico border and dozens of new immigratio­n judges to slash the immigratio­n court’s backlog of roughly 600,000 cases.

Trump has also lifted the Obama-era restrictio­ns that shielded millions of undocument­ed immigrants from deportatio­n if they had no criminal histories or were the parents of American-citizen children. Now, immigratio­n agents are free to arrest anyone who is in the United States illegally.

In May, U.S. Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t said it was arresting more than 400 immigrants a day. In the president’s first three months in office, ICE arrested 41,318 immigrants, up 37.6 percent over the same period last year. Most had criminal records, but the largest increase was among immigrants with no records at all.

The internal DHS memo states that the expanded authority for expedited removals “will enhance national security and public safety” by alleviatin­g the “historic backlogs” at the nation’s immigratio­n courts that have led to delays in hearings for more than two years. At the start of this year, there were more than 534,000 removal cases pending in immigratio­n courts, according to the memo.

That is compared with a total of 168,000 cases in 2004, when the Bush-era guidelines were implemente­d. President Barack Obama’s administra­tion maintained those guidelines.

The Trump administra­tion’s proposed new policy would “eliminate incentives not only to enter the country unlawfully but also to attempt to quickly travel into the interior of the United States in an effort to avoid the applicatio­n of expedited removal,” the memo states.

Unaccompan­ied minors are not currently subject to expedited deportatio­ns, nor would they be under the new guidelines that are under review, officials said.

One Trump administra­tion official involved in the internal deliberati­ons said the new policy would have a “deterrent effect” on immigrants who are considerin­g entering the country illegally or overstayin­g their visas. This official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because no final decisions have been made, said immigrant rights groups take advantage of existing laws to try to drag out court proceeding­s “as long as possible.”

According to the DHS memo, those immigrants placed into the expedited deportatio­n process under the new guidelines would still be afforded the opportunit­y to claim a credible fear of persecutio­n or torture and to be interviewe­d by an asylum officer under those circumstan­ces, who would determine whether the fear is credible. If credible fear is found, that person would be referred to an immigratio­n judge for further considerat­ion of their case, just as they are now, the memo states.

The potential changes come as the number of immigrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally has fallen sharply since Trump took office, a shift that administra­tion officials have credited to immigrant fears of harsher Trump policies.

Yet the DHS memo cites figures from last fall, when the level of illegal border crossings was much higher, to make the case that the agency’s resources have been strained, creating “unacceptab­le national security and public safety vulnerabil­ities.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States