Santa Fe New Mexican

Goodbye to clean power

-

From a certain perspectiv­e, Environmen­tal Protection Agency Administra­tor Scott Pruitt’s move to rip up the Clean Power Plan, President Barack Obama’s signature climate change policy, hardly seems radical. The EPA chief repealed a rule he claims was illegal. Indeed, it was something of a stretch for the EPA to regulate planet-warming carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act, a law originally written to handle more traditiona­l pollutants. The Obama administra­tion took an expansive approach, pushing the law as far as it could so that Obama’s climate negotiator­s could credibly promise that the United States would cut its carbon emissions if other nations would, too.

Yet the Obama EPA’s Clean Power Plan did not, in our view and that of many experts, break the law. The Supreme Court has already ruled that the EPA must regulate carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act.

Pruitt has not yet proposed a replacemen­t plan; he began a public comment process that may lead to a new set of regulation­s on carbon emissions. It is technicall­y possible that his EPA will decide to instate new rules that are serious, if less aggressive than Obama’s. But everything about Pruitt’s history — relentless­ly suing the Obama administra­tion, denying climate science, shutting environmen­talist voices out of the EPA — suggests he will aim to do the minimum the courts will allow.

As if to confirm that reading, Pruitt announced his Clean Power Plan rollback in coal country, declaring that “the war against coal is over.” Economist Paul Krugman has pointed out that 18 times more jobs have been lost at department stores than in the coal business since the turn of the century. Neverthele­ss, it is on behalf of a dirty, dying and relatively small industry that Pruitt will go down as one of the nation’s worst environmen­tal stewards. He may believe that the Obama administra­tion’s climate plan was radical. But his approach — anti-scientific, ideologica­l, a betrayal of his office — is far more so.

There is another notable villain: Congress. For decades, lawmakers have dawdled while the greatest environmen­tal challenge of our time has worsened, each wasted year making it harder to address. Once the science became clear — and it has been for years now — it became legislator­s’ responsibi­lity to craft a law specifical­ly designed to address the carbon issue. Instead, they punted to the executive branch, leading to the chaotic regulatory seesaw now on display. The right response to Pruitt’s radical action is a reassertio­n of congressio­nal responsibi­lity.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States