Santa Fe New Mexican

Tax overhaul nearly done

GOP gathers enough support to pass massive tax plan with implicatio­ns for all Americans

- By Damian Paletta, Erica Werner, Jeff Stein and Mike DeBonis

Congressio­nal Republican­s secured enough support Friday to pass their massive tax plan, a measure that would deliver a major legislativ­e victory to President Donald Trump and his GOP allies and make tax changes affecting nearly every American family and business.

Passage appeared certain after two critical holdouts, Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Bob Corker, R-Tenn., said they would vote for the bill next week.

Rubio was the key piece of a complicate­d and shifting political puzzle that the White House and GOP leaders spent months trying to solve, as all Democrats vowed to oppose the bill and a handful of Republican­s made strident demands.

The Florida Republican insisted on an expansion of the child tax credit in exchange for his vote, and GOP leaders relented, growing a benefit for working-class families. Corker’s support was unexpected, as he had opposed an earlier version of the tax bill two weeks ago amid concerns about its additions to the deficit.

But Friday he said he viewed the bill as a “once-in-a-generation opportunit­y” that, combined with changes to immigratio­n and trade policy, would help the economy.

The bill would push into law a $1.5 trillion tax package that was mostly written by Republican­s behind closed doors and with

little public debate.

If passed, the measure would represent Trump’s first major legislativ­e victory. It includes an overhaul of the tax code and a targeted change to the Affordable Care Act, the Obama-era health care law Republican­s have long sought to dismantle.

Under the tax plan, Americans would lose the personal exemptions that often dictate how much money is withheld from their paychecks. They would instead pay taxes through a new regime that exempts a higher level of income from taxation and then subjects much of the rest to lower rates. Many more Americans would have access to the child tax credit, but they would also face a new cap on the federal deduction for state and local tax payments.

On net, Republican­s believe that the bill would lower most people’s taxes. But many Americans — particular­ly those in high-tax states such as New York and California — would see their taxes go up.

The House and the Senate plan to vote on the bill next week, clearing the way for Trump to sign it into law. Many of its changes would go into effect in January.

The tax plan has enormous benefits for many businesses, with a permanent and sharp reduction in tax rates that Republican­s promise would trigger more economic growth, new hiring and higher wages.

It also would change the tax system for households, temporaril­y lowering rates and creating new limits on deductions; this is expected to reduce taxes for most Americans but could still lead millions to owe the government more.

The plan would also add at least $1 trillion to the debt over 10 years, according to numerous economic forecasts, an issue that is likely to intensify policy debate in Washington into 2018 as both parties square off over how to deal with the deficit.

The bill was originally pitched as a sweeping tax cut for the middle class, but it changed over the course of several months as Republican­s demanded alteration­s.

A number of GOP donors complained that the bill could push their taxes up, so Republican­s agreed to a late change that would cut the top tax rate to 37 percent (down from 39.6 percent) for income above $600,000 for a married couple filing jointly.

Corker’s attempts to change the bill were rejected by GOP leaders — he had tried to put in place a mechanism that would limit the plan’s impact on the debt if it didn’t lead to the type of economic growth that Republican­s had promised. He voted against the legislatio­n in early December, but he was the only defection at the time, and Republican­s were able to pass the bill without him.

Republican­s had to soften a number of their proposed tax changes so that the bill fit within congressio­nal budget rules.

Trump originally wanted to lower the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 15 percent, but Republican­s eventually settled on a 21 percent rate.

They also decided to make those tax cuts permanent, and lock in reductions for families and businesses only through 2025 to limit the cost. They have promised that a future Congress will extend those tax cuts, though the outcome for such a decision is uncertain.

For many Americans, the tax bill could have an immediate impact. It could alter the tax benefits of mortgages issued in just two weeks, and Americans could see more takehome pay in their paychecks by February.

The process of filing taxes each year would change and could lead Americans to shift how they allocate money.

The bill would repeal enforcemen­t of a provision of the Affordable Care Act that penalizes many Americans if they don’t have some form of health insurance. This change would take effect in 2019 under the bill.

Many of the changes made late in the negotiatio­ns would benefit businesses and the wealthy, but Rubio’s last-minute demands pulled the package back a bit more toward its working-class roots.

Republican­s had proposed to expand the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000, but the benefits formula they’d planned to use would have capped it for many low- and moderate-income families at $1,100. Rubio demanded that the credit be raised, and Republican­s at first believed he would balk, in part because he voted for the Senate bill even after the party denied his effort to expand the child tax credit in that measure.

But when he threatened Thursday to block the bill and appeared to have the backing of Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, Republican leaders agreed to expand the tax credit up to $1,400 for those families. The credit would begin to phase out for households that earn more than $400,000.

Many of the changes to the tax code that Republican­s initially sought were dialed back or removed.

They opted against imposing taxes that would have hit graduate students, and they did not strip away tax benefits for families who adopt children.

They had proposed to eliminate the estate tax and the Alternativ­e Minimum Tax for individual­s, but those changes proved too costly, and the final plan would exempt more families from these taxes but not get rid of them.

Democrats have blasted the bill, saying it would shower corporatio­ns with lower taxes at the expense of driving up the debt and giving only temporary and uneven benefits to the middle class. The tax rate cuts for individual­s and households would expire after eight years, while most of the cuts for corporatio­ns would be permanent.

“It’s daylight robbery,” said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. “And with every iteration, the GOP tax scam becomes even more cowardly, outrageous, dishonest, brazen theft from middle-class families, giving money from them to the richest people in our country and to corporatio­ns. It’s a monumental con job.”

 ?? TOM BRENNER/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? A protester follows Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., on Wednesday outside Senate offices on Capitol Hill in Washington. Corker, who voted against the initial Senate bill over deficit concerns, said he would support the legislatio­n.
TOM BRENNER/THE NEW YORK TIMES A protester follows Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., on Wednesday outside Senate offices on Capitol Hill in Washington. Corker, who voted against the initial Senate bill over deficit concerns, said he would support the legislatio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States