Santa Fe New Mexican

Ceremonial measures build camaraderi­e but squander time.

- By Steve Terrell

At the end of every legislativ­e session, there are dozens of bills that die on the House or Senate floor. When asked what happened, legislativ­e leaders invariably shrug their shoulders and say, “We just ran out of time …”

Which is true. But in the days and weeks that lead to the last moments of a session, lawmakers eat up untold hours — joking around, talking sports, engaging in ceremonial activities and spending time on legislatio­n that doesn’t have the force of law. Call these activities “time bandits.” Gov. Susana Martinez last year struck a chord — even with some of her critics — when she blasted lawmakers for spending time on “meaningles­s bills,” such as those to establish an official state dance or state holiday song or official state hamburger. Martinez was unhappy because the Senate did not hold confirmati­on hearings on many of her nominees and didn’t pass bills she was pushing.

The time the House and Senate spend on nonbinding pieces of legislatio­n, known as memorials, causes much of the heartburn. But defenders of the practice say it gives lawmakers a chance to express their position on an issue.

Sometimes, memorials request a state agency to conduct a study on some matter. Other times, they state a position on a controvers­ial political matter, such as one that proposes opposition to constructi­on of a federal border wall on state land. These normally produce lengthy partisan spats if they make it to the floor.

Often, memorials simply honor some person, place or thing in New Mexico — a high school sports team, a politician who has died, or a New Mexico town or city. Many municipali­ties are bestowed a designated day of honor.

Veteran legislator­s often defend this use of their time, saying it helps build camaraderi­e and allows lawmakers to blow off steam. Some also argue that the House and Senate often take up nonbinding memorials because something has caused a delay in hearing a bill.

Rep. Bill McCamley, D-Las Cruces, said some memorials dealing with important issues can make a difference. For instance, a few years ago he sponsored one calling on the Legislativ­e Finance Committee to look at the effects of legalizing marijuana. McCamley later used those findings to craft his own legalizati­on bill.

Even memorials that honor a person for an accomplish­ment have value, he said.

“It really makes somebody’s day,” McCamley said. “To have a piece of paper signed by everyone for some accomplish­ment may not be important for us, but it’s important to them.”

All of this can grate on the nerves of those watching legislativ­e proceeding­s from the galleries or on the Legislatur­e’s webcast.

Some lawmakers have criticized the practice. In 2012, Don Bratton of Hobbs, the House Republican whip at the time, introduced a tongue-in-cheek memorial calling for a second legislativ­e session that year just to handle memorials.

In that memorable memorial memorial, Bratton noted that in 1996, there were only seven House memorials introduced. But in 2012, there were nearly 80. Bratton’s legislatio­n said memorials in the House alone that year cost the taxpayers roughly $35 per page for 450 pages and that the House had spent an average of two hours a day debating them.

And it’s only gotten worse. In 2016, the most recent 30-day session, there were 110 memorials plus nine joint memorials introduced in the House — and even more in the Senate.

In less than a week after the current session convened, the House has introduced 22 memorials and joint memorials, while the Senate has introduced 24. To be fair, many of them appear serious, covering legitimate issues such as creating a UNM Movement Disorders Center, reviewing other states’ workers’ compensati­on trends and forming an opioid crisis subcommitt­ee.

But there also are the usual ceremonial time-wasters: OK’ing a 50thannive­rsary Albuquerqu­e Internatio­nal Balloon Fiesta stamp; celebratin­g “Santa Fe Day” and “Las Vegas Day.” And both the House and Senate have memorials calling for a study on a possible sugary beverage tax. They could just study this: Last year, voters in liberal Santa Fe overwhelmi­ngly rejected such a tax.

Longtime observers say perhaps the most esoteric memorial in recent memory was the one carried for three straight sessions by the late Rep. Eric Youngberg, R-Albuquerqu­e. That timeless piece of legislatio­n declared that ancient Macedonian­s should be recognized as Hellenes, and that the inhabitant­s of the northern province of Greece, as well as Macedonia, should be recognized as their descendant­s. Youngberg, who died in 2010, said he introduced the measure as a favor to a Greek friend. The House finally passed the memorial in 2007.

But memorials aren’t the only time bandits you might see during this session. Here are some others:

“I’d like to introduce my guests”: Each day, both chambers start out with a flag salute, a prayer and then a tedious procession of lawmakers introducin­g their young pages — usually listing the kid’s parents, school, hobbies and other vital informatio­n — and recognizin­g people in the gallery, such as relatives, stray dignitarie­s and rows of bored looking students.

How ’bout them Vikings? If you miss the Super Bowl this year, don’t worry. Just drop by the Roundhouse the next day, and you’ll hear the Monday morning quarterbac­ks of the Legislatur­e relive the whole game during the morning floor sessions. Even more so with the annual House-Senate charity basketball game, which is scheduled for Feb. 5.

Praising the dead: When a former legislator dies — at least those who have been in the Roundhouse recently enough to have worked with some of the current members — he or she will get a tearful send-off from both the House and the Senate. These normally last for at least an hour. Veteran Democratic Rep. Luciano “Lucky” Varela of Santa Fe died last year, so he’s bound to get this treatment — even though the no-nonsense, wonkish Varela probably would have preferred his former colleagues work on legislatio­n instead.

So long, it’s been good to know ya: Some lawmakers also give the roses to the living. When a legislator is retiring, colleagues will lavish them with praise, as well as humorous stories (which usually aren’t that funny). This is the last regular session for longtime Rep. Nick Salazar, D-Ohkay Owingeh, who announced he will not seek re-election to the seat he was first elected to in 1972. He’s bound to receive a lengthy tribute on the House floor and maybe even in the Senate, where Salazar has many friends. Also leaving are three representa­tives running for higher office. McCamley is running for state auditor, while Rep. Yvette Herrell, R-Alamogordo, is running for the U.S. House and Rep. Stephanie Garcia Richard, D-Los Alamos, is running for state land commission­er. Rep. Dennis Roch, R-Logan, has said he won’t run again. House members are bound to take time to salute these colleagues and any others who announce retirement in the next three weeks. None of the senators are facing re-election this year, so there will be fewer retirement­s there.

What about that official state burger? New Mexico has a state bird, a state cookie, a state gem, even a designated aircraft, which all began with legislatio­n. But because of criticism last year from the governor — and because it’s a short session — there probably will be fewer of those type of bills this year.

But doesn’t it strike you as odd that there is no official New Mexico state hair-metal song?

Contact Steve Terrell at 505-986-3037 or sterrell@sfnewmexic­an.com. Read his blog at www.santafenew­mexican.com/roundhouse_roundup.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States