Santa Fe New Mexican

$60B tariff plan draws China’s ire

Stocks fall as president says trade action long overdue

- By David J. Lynch

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump embarked Thursday on the sharpest trade confrontat­ion with China in nearly a quarter-century, moving toward imposing tariffs on $60 billion in Chinese goods and limiting China’s freedom to invest in the U.S. technology industry.

Trump’s actions — which sent stocks to their biggest one-day drop in six weeks — followed a government finding that China had treated U.S. companies unfairly by coercing them into surrenderi­ng trade secrets for market access.

“We’re doing things for this country that should have been done for many, many years,” the president said at the White House.

Trump directed U.S. Trade Representa­tive Robert Lighthizer to propose within 15 days tariff increases designed

to compensate the United States for lost profits and jobs. After a comment period, the list, targeting Chinese products that benefited from U.S. technology, will be made public.

But even as he confronted China over technology, Trump weakened a new tariff meant to protect U.S. production of industrial metals, potentiall­y exempting the European Union, Brazil and other countries accounting for two-thirds of steel imports and more than half of foreign-made aluminum.

By challengin­g China, Trump rejected the approach of his Republican and Democratic predecesso­rs, gambling that China will bend before he does. “We don’t know how this is going to turn out,” said Scott Kennedy, director of the project on Chinese business at the Center for Strategic and Internatio­nal Studies. “It could be resolved in a few months, or it could spiral out of control into a broader strategic rivalry.”

Early reviews were not good. On Wall Street, the benchmark Dow Jones industrial average plunged more than 700 points, or almost 3 percent, as investors blanched at the prospect of a trade war between the world’s two largest economies.

“There’s a lot of concern about this administra­tion’s shoot-first approach,” said Josh Bolten, president of the Business Roundtable. “… The victims of the actions that the administra­tion is proposing to take are principall­y Americans.”

Trump is betting that disrupting the traditiona­l U.S. approach to China will yield a better commercial bargain for American businesses and workers than the status quo that he blames for hollowing out American industry.

Among U.S. politician­s and business leaders, there is broad agreement that China has violated U.S. intellectu­al property rights through restrictiv­e licensing arrangemen­ts in China and outright cybertheft in the United States.

But Thursday’s actions threatens to unravel global supply chains, increase costs for consumers and open the door to Chinese retaliatio­n against U.S. farmers and businesses.

“The biggest and most powerful American companies are stuck in the middle,” said James McGregor, APCO Worldwide’s chairman for greater China. “They’re schizophre­nic now. They don’t want today’s business to be eliminated. But they know China’s plan for tomorrow is to eliminate them in the Chinese market and then take them on globally.”

At $60 billion in affected products, Trump’s China actions carry a bigger punch than the tariffs on $46 billion in steel and aluminum imports that he announced March 8.

The impact of those earlier levies may shrink further: Lighthizer told the Senate Finance Committee on Thursday that products from the European Union, Australia, Argentina, South Korea and Brazil will not be affected when the tariffs go into effect Friday while negotiatio­ns over potential exemptions continue.

Trump already had exempted Canada and Mexico from the import levies for the duration of talks aimed at renegotiat­ing the North American Free Trade Agreement.

Still, the likely China tariffs pose little immediate threat to the growing economy because they will touch just 3 percent of total goods imports, according to Andrew Hunter, U.S. economist for Capital Economics.

The big worry is how China responds and whether the countries stumble into a tit-for-tat slugfest. In Washington, the Chinese Embassy distribute­d a statement from Ambassador Cui Tiankai rejecting Trump’s claims of intellectu­al property violations and warning that his approach would hurt “American middle-class people,” U.S. companies and the stock market.

“We don’t want a trade war. But we are not afraid of it,” Cui said. “If somebody tries to impose a trade war on us, we will certainly fight back and retaliate. If people want to play tough, we will play tough with them and see who will last longer.”

The United States last adopted this sort of uncompromi­sing approach in a 1995 dispute over intellectu­al property rights. China ultimately acceded to U.S. demands, but today its economy is almost 17 times as big, making it less vulnerable to American pressure.

A Sino-U.S. trade war would affect economies that account for roughly 40 percent of global output, which explains the mounting apprehensi­on on Wall Street.

“Trump’s economics team blew it,” economist Chris Rupkey of MUFG Union Bank wrote in a research note. “… Tariffs mean a trade war and the news has the world’s investors running for the exits.”

The president blamed China for the loss of 60,000 factories and 6 million jobs, a number that most economists say blends the impact on U.S. employment of both Chinese competitio­n and automation.

Trump said that unfair Chinese trade practices are responsibl­e for the yawning U.S. trade deficit with China, which has reached a record $375 billion on his watch.

“Any way you look at it, it’s the largest of any country in the history of our world,” the president said. “It’s out of control.”

 ?? JABIN BOTSFORD/THE WASHINGTON POST ?? Presiden Donald Trump proposes $60 billion in annual tariffs against Chinese products, following through on his threat.
JABIN BOTSFORD/THE WASHINGTON POST Presiden Donald Trump proposes $60 billion in annual tariffs against Chinese products, following through on his threat.
 ??  ?? U.S.-CHINA TRADE IMBALANCE
U.S.-CHINA TRADE IMBALANCE

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States