Santa Fe New Mexican

Congress pushes dog, cat consumptio­n ban

Bill supports internatio­nal animal rights activists

- The Caitlin Dewey

WASHINGTON — Lawmakers on Capitol Hill advanced a proposal to outlaw dog and cat consumptio­n last week — but not because Americans are eating their pets.

Backers say the purpose of the proposed measure is to support internatio­nal animal rights activists.

If passed, the ban would send a clear signal that the United States condemns the dog and cat meat trades in East Asia, said Sara Amundson, executive director of the Humane Society Legislativ­e Fund, which lobbied for the measure. The Humane Society estimates that 30 million dogs are killed for food each year, mostly in China and South Korea. Activists there have questioned why the United States does not have its own dog meat law. “There are a number of countries in Asia where the trade still exists very strongly,” Amundson said. “One of the messages that came to us was, ‘Look, if you’re going to come to our countries and export your concept of what should be done with animals, shouldn’t you make sure a trade does not take hold in the U.S.?’ ”

Documented cases of dog and cat consumptio­n in the United States are rare. A database search of 10 years of U.S. newspaper articles turned up a single case from 2008, when two maintenanc­e workers at a Hawaii golf club were accused of stealing a German shepherd-Lab mix from a man who was golfing there, then later eating it.

Representa­tives from the Humane Society and the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, which also backed the measure, said they are not aware of any other cases in the past 10 years or of any evidence of a U.S. dog meat trade. Only four incidents have been widely reported in the past three decades.

But the animal rights activists raised concerns that, in the absence of a ban, such a practice could theoretica­lly continue. Six states ban dog- and cat-eating: Georgia, Hawaii, Michigan, New York, Virginia and California. In other states, animal welfare laws have been used to prosecute isolated instances of dog slaughter and consumptio­n.

The measure would make it a felony to knowingly slaughter, buy or sell a dog or cat to eat. Violations would be punishable by a fine or up to a year in prison.

“I think when it comes to laws protecting animals, it’s better to be safe than sorry,” said Ashley Byrne, a campaign coordinato­r for PETA. “Most of us would prefer to see a law in place that would prevent something cruel from happening to animals — we want this to be illegal.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States