Santa Fe New Mexican

As Trump touts powers, lawyers ready for fight

President calls right to pardon himself ‘absolute’

- By Carol D. Leonnig, Robert Costa, Rosalind S. Helderman and Josh Dawsey

WASHINGTON — Despite President Donald Trump’s declaratio­ns that he has expansive powers that could blunt the special-counsel investigat­ion, his legal team is preparing for the possibilit­y of a presidenti­al interview, or a legally precarious subpoena battle over such a sit-down.

Trump declared in tweets Monday that he has the “absolute right” to pardon himself and called the special counsel unconstitu­tional, the latest efforts by the president and his lawyers to assert his authority over the federal law enforcemen­t system.

But private moves by Trump’s attorneys and advisers indicate that — despite the president’s public bravado — they are readying for a fraught legal confrontat­ion that could have far-reaching consequenc­es.

Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani has acknowledg­ed in recent interviews with the Washington Post that the outcome of such a showdown is uncertain.

“Both sides are taking a big risk with a subpoena fight,” he said.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller is investigat­ing Russia’s efforts to help elect Trump and whether

Trump sought to block the probe into contacts his associates have had with Russians.

As the two sides head toward a confrontat­ion over a presidenti­al interview in the coming weeks, newly hired White House lawyer Emmet Flood and other attorneys are strategizi­ng about how to handle a subpoena from Mueller that would seek to compel Trump to testify in the investigat­ion.

Several White House officials said Flood has cautioned Trump and others about the unpredicta­bility of a subpoena fight that could be decided by the Supreme Court. Such a case would be unpreceden­ted. Independen­t counsel Kenneth Starr served President Bill Clinton with a subpoena to compel him to appear before a grand jury, but it was withdrawn after Clinton agreed to testify voluntaril­y.

“There’s not a lot to research, because it’s never been decided,” Giuliani said. “No one has ever tested completely the privilege.”

Meanwhile, Giuliani and other advisers have begun making plans to prepare Trump for a possible sit-down with Mueller. They are eyeing a few special guests — including former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, a Republican — to conduct practice sessions with the president.

Giuliani said Christie, who played the role of Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton in Trump’s 2016 debate preparatio­ns, is willing to help.

“I’d like to bring Chris Christie in,” he said. “He and Chris get along, and Chris is a lawyer, so you have attorney-client privilege.” Christie did not respond to a request for comment. Another new Trump lawyer, Jane Raskin, talks with Mueller deputy James Quarles at least three times a week. She is reviewing the classified conversati­ons Trump and other top aides have had with foreign leaders, such as Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, according to two people familiar with her work, but also is working to negotiate possible terms and limit questions Trump might face in an interview.

And inside the White House, officials have tried to begin delving into key subjects with the president that might come up in a session with Mueller. However, the fledgling briefings have not gone very deep, because of the president’s anger about the probe, according to a person familiar with the situation.

“As has been stated by numerous legal scholars, I have the absolute right to PARDON myself, but why would I do that when I have done nothing wrong?” Trump tweeted Monday. “In the meantime, the never ending Witch Hunt, led by 13 very Angry and Conflicted Democrats (& others) continues into the mid-terms!”

A spokesman for the special counsel’s office declined to comment.

Trump’s assertion about his pardon powers followed revelation­s that his lawyers wrote a confidenti­al January memo to Mueller arguing Trump could not have obstructed the probe, because, as president, he has total control over all federal investigat­ions. Legal scholars differ on the issue of whether the president can pardon himself — and even some Republican­s questioned the reading of the law by Trump’s legal team.

“If I were president and somebody, some lawyer told me that I could do that, I’d hire a new lawyer,” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, told reporters.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said that while constituti­onal scholars differ on whether Trump could pardon himself, “there’s no doubt that the president is not above the law and it would be a tremendous abuse of his authority if he were to do so — as well as remarkably unwise.”

Trump’s controvers­ial assertion comes as his legal team is in talks with Mueller about a presidenti­al interview. The special counsel told Trump’s attorneys earlier this spring that he needs to question the president about his intent to finish a report on possible obstructio­n of justice.

Mueller and his deputies first warned the president’s lawyers in March that they could try to force Trump to the interview table with a grand-jury subpoena.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States