Santa Fe New Mexican

AT&T, Time Warner merger could pave way for others

U.S. government tried to stop $85.4 billion AT&T-Time Warner deal

- By Cecilia Kang, Edmund Lee and Emily Cochrane

WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Tuesday approved the blockbuste­r merger between AT&T and Time Warner, rebuffing the government’s effort to stop the $85.4 billion deal, in a decision that is expected to unleash a wave of corporate takeovers.

The judge, Richard J. Leon of U.S. District Court in Washington, said the Justice Department had not proved that the telecom company’s acquisitio­n of Time Warner would lead to fewer choices for consumers and higher prices for television and internet services.

The merger would create a media and telecommun­ications powerhouse, reshaping the landscape of those industries. The combined company would have a library that includes HBO’s hit Game of Thrones and channels like CNN, along with vast distributi­on reach through wireless and satellite television services across the country.

Media executives increasing­ly say content creation and distributi­on must be married to survive against technology companies like Amazon and Netflix. Those companies started producing their own shows in just the last several years. But they now spend billions of dollars a year on original programmin­g, and users can stream the video on apps in homes and on mobile devices, putting pressure on traditiona­l media businesses.

Executives and investors of other companies had watched the six-week trial closely for signs about how it might affect their ambitions. Comcast, for example, would like to beat out the Walt Disney Co. for some of 21st Century Fox’s assets, but has held off from making a formal bid until the trial ended.

“If there ever were an antitrust case where the parties had a dramatical­ly different assessment of the current state of the relevant market and a fundamenta­lly different vision of its future developmen­t, this is the one,” Leon wrote in his opinion.

The ruling is a major setback for the Justice Department and its antitrust chief, Makan Delrahim, whose decision to sue to block the merger broke with convention. Deals such as this one, in which the two companies are in related industries but do not produce competing products, are usually approved by federal regulators.

Delrahim had insisted that the two companies sell some major parts before getting government approval, a demand that the executives rejected. That led to the Justice Department file its lawsuit in November. Leon’s decision essentiall­y confirmed the convention­al thinking about antitrust law.

Delrahim appeared somber after the decision. He said he was disappoint­ed and would review the 172-page opinion before deciding whether the government would ask a higher court to issue a stay of the ruling. The Justice Department could appeal the decision even if it did not get an injunction.

“I’ve taken an oath to uphold competitio­n,” Delrahim said. “We are going to take the next steps as necessary.”

Leon took the unusual step of warning the government not to try to seek a stay, saying it would hurt the defendants, which had already gone through an 18-month regulatory and legal battle for their review. The companies face a June 21 deadline to close their deal.

David McAtee, AT&T’s general counsel, said the company was pleased with the opinion and looked forward to giving “consumers video entertainm­ent that is more affordable, mobile and innovative.”

Shares in AT&T fell 2.7 percent in after-hours trading, while shares in Time Warner jumped 4.5 percent.

The deal would put AT&T in charge of Time Warner’s vast portfolio, which includes HBO and CNN, rights to major sports leagues, and valuable film franchises such as Harry Potter. John Stankey, an AT&T executive, would oversee the integratio­n of these units into AT&T and eventually lead the Time Warner business.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States