Santa Fe New Mexican

President’s space force directive met with skepticism

- By Katie Rogers

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said Monday that he would direct the Pentagon to establish a sixth branch of the armed forces dedicated to protecting U.S. interests in outer space, an idea that has troubled lawmakers and even some members of his administra­tion, who have cautioned that the action could create unnecessar­y bureaucrat­ic responsibi­lities for a military already burdened by conflicts.

During a speech at a meeting of the National Space Council, Trump announced plans to protect U.S. interests in space through monitoring commercial traffic and debris, initiative­s he said would be “great not only in terms of jobs and everything else, it’s great for the psyche of our country.”

Minutes later, the president zeroed in on Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and tasked him with the undertakin­g of creating another branch of the military.

“Gen. Dunford, if you would carry that assignment out, I would be very greatly honored,” Trump said from the podium, after searching for him in the crowd. “We got it,” the general replied.

With his statement, Trump waded into a policy debate about space that has spanned administra­tions, beginning in earnest during the Clinton era. Trump, who has previously teased his desire to create a space force, entered the fray as he was scheduled to sign a less ambitious proposal, one that would establish a framework for directing commercial traffic in space and monitoring debris.

Analysts were puzzling over the particular­s. “Does that verbal order translate into something more concrete?” said Todd Harrison, director of the Aerospace Security Project and director of Defense Budget Analysis at the Center for Strategic and Internatio­nal Studies. “The most he can really ask them to do is start planning for it.”

With his interest in space, Trump appears to be taking a more protective stance than his modern predecesso­rs, who over the years have wrestled with ways — and with rival government­s, including Russia and China — to keep military conflicts in space at bay while still protecting U.S. interests, including commercial operations and the current satellite system.

“At best this is simply the creation of an additional DOD bureaucrac­y,” Daryl G. Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Associatio­n, said in an interview, referring to the Department of Defense. “At worst, it is the first step in an accelerate­d competitio­n between the U.S., China and Russia in the space realm that is going to be more difficult to avert without direct talks about responsibl­e rules of the road.”

The military and Congress have warned that a plan to establish another branch of the armed forces over space protection and space missions would require a long and detailed process, and that the current period of global conflict is not the time to weigh the armed forces down with bureaucrat­ic measures. “At a time when we are trying to integrate the department’s joint war-fighting functions, I do not wish to add a separate service that would likely present a narrower and even parochial approach to space operations,” Defense Secretary Jim Mattis wrote in a letter last year to Rep. Michael R. Turner, R-Ohio, chairman of the House Tactical Air and Land Forces Subcommitt­ee. Turner has opposed a legislativ­e effort by the House Armed Services Committee to create a space division of the military.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States