Santa Fe New Mexican

Judge criticizes U.S. failure to reunify families

- By Elliot Spagat

SAN DIEGO — A federal judge, responding to a plan to reunify children separated at the border, said he was having second thoughts about his belief that the Trump administra­tion was acting in good faith to comply with his orders.

The Justice Department on Friday filed a plan to reunify more than 2,500 children age 5 and older by a court-imposed deadline of July 26 using “truncated” procedures to verify parentage and perform background checks, which exclude DNA testing and other steps it took to reunify children under 5.

The administra­tion said the abbreviate­d vetting puts children at significan­t safety risk but is needed to meet the deadline.

Chris Meekins, deputy assistant Health and Human Services secretary for preparedne­ss and response, filed a declaratio­n that he is fully committed to meeting the deadline. However, he does not believe “the placing of children into such situations is consistent with the mission of HHS or my core values.”

U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw took umbrage at Meekins’ statement, disputing the official’s interpreta­tion of his orders and saying that safe reunificat­ion could and will occur by July 26.

“It is clear from Mr. Meekins’s declaratio­n that HHS either does not understand the court’s orders or is acting in defiance of them,” the judge wrote late Friday. “At a minimum, it appears he is attempting to provide cover to defendants for their own conduct in the practice of family separation, and the lack of foresight and infrastruc­ture necessary to remedy the harms caused by that practice.”

Sabraw, an appointee of President George W. Bush, said Meekins’ statement calls into question his comments in court hours earlier that the administra­tion was acting in good faith.

Sabraw said in court Friday that the administra­tion had largely complied with orders but, at the same time, he indicated he will be monitoring its actions ahead of the deadline.

The judge said the administra­tion must provide a list of names of parents in immigratio­n custody and their children by Monday and complete background checks for them by Thursday. He scheduled four hearings over the next two weeks for updates, including one on Monday.

“The task is laborious, but can be accomplish­ed in the time and manner prescribed,” he wrote in his order.

Evelyn Stauffer, a spokeswoma­n for Health and Human Services, said the administra­tion proposed its plan “in the interests of transparen­cy and cooperatio­n” after concluding that the abbreviate­d vetting was necessary to make the deadline.

 ?? ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? Protesters chant ‘Families belong together!’ June 28 as they walk to the federal courthouse in Brownsvill­e, Texas. A federal judge, responding to a plan to reunify families separated at the border, said he was having second thoughts about his belief that the Trump administra­tion was acting in good faith to comply with his orders.
ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO Protesters chant ‘Families belong together!’ June 28 as they walk to the federal courthouse in Brownsvill­e, Texas. A federal judge, responding to a plan to reunify families separated at the border, said he was having second thoughts about his belief that the Trump administra­tion was acting in good faith to comply with his orders.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States