Santa Fe New Mexican

Russia’s anti-doping agency is reinstated

- By Victor Mather and Tariq Panja

The global regulator of drugs in sports on Thursday voted to allow Russia to resume testing its athletes for performanc­e-enhancing drugs, despite an outcry from athletes and watchdogs that Moscow has not done enough to clean up its record of corruption in competitio­ns.

Russia, whose drug-testing agency has been banned for three years, will now be able to certify on its own that its athletes are not using illicit drugs, allowing them easier entry to a range of competitio­ns. Russia will also be able to issue what are known as therapeuti­c use exemptions, which permit athletes to use certain prohibited drugs for medical reasons.

The executive board of the World Anti-Doping Agency made the move despite a series of independen­t investigat­ions that found Russia had orchestrat­ed a vast, state-sponsored doping scheme that tainted the Olympics and other major sports events.

It comes at a time of mounting skepticism about the fairness of internatio­nal sports competitio­ns as the use of performanc­e-enhancing drugs remains pervasive. Athletes say they do not have faith that their competitor­s are not doping. They also say the governing bodies of their sports have failed to ensure the integrity of the competitio­n, even at the highest profile events like the Olympics.

The decision clears Russia to start hosting internatio­nal sports events again. In addition, it paves the way for Russian athletes to begin competing under their own flag in every sport. Russia’s track and field athletes might be welcomed back at all internatio­nal events. The IAAF, track and field’s world governing body, had refused to accept Russian athletes while the country’s anti-doping agency was not considered in compliance with WADA standards.

Minutes after Russia was cleared by WADA, the organizers of the European Games, a multisport event, named Kazan, Russia, to a shortlist of three cities to host the event in 2023.

The vote by WADA’s board was 9-2, with one abstention, to reinstate Russia’s anti-doping agency, which had been banned since 2015 after investigat­ors found it was at the center of the doping conspiracy at the 2014 Winter Games in Sochi, Russia.

The conspiracy included, among other methods, substituti­ng clean urine for tainted samples through a hidden hole in the wall at the agency’s testing laboratory in Sochi. The lab was guarded by members of Russia’s state security services, according to the investigat­ions.

The doping conspiracy led the Internatio­nal Olympic Committee to ban Russia from the Winter Olympics this year in Pyeongchan­g, South Korea.

Nearly 170 Russian athletes ultimately participat­ed through special dispensati­ons from the internatio­nal sports federation­s. But Russia’s National Olympic Committee was prohibited from attending. The Russian flag was not officially displayed and the athletes had to wear neutral uniforms with “Olympic Athlete from Russia” printed on them.

After the games, Russia continued to deny the state had sponsored the doping and it declined to give investigat­ors access to its testing labs and possibly tainted urine samples. Russia, in an agreement with WADA, was supposed to admit to the doping scheme and turn over data and samples before the agency reinstated it.

After negotiatio­ns between Russian officials and leaders of internatio­nal sports organizati­ons, however, a WADA committee unexpected­ly recommende­d the reinstatem­ent last Friday. The full board, meeting in the Seychelles, affirmed it.

The organizati­on backed off insisting that Russia accept the findings of an investigat­ion by Richard McLaren that laid out evidence of a state-supported doping program in Sochi. Instead, WADA asked Russia to accept the less harsh findings on the government’s role in what is known as the Schmid report, produced by an IOC commission.

Pavel Kolobkov, Russia’s sports minister, said in a letter to WADA that his government accepted the findings of the Schmid report and agreed to turn over data and stored samples from Russian athletes.

WADA’s president, Craig Reedie, said that the reinstatem­ent came with “strict conditions” and that Russia could be ruled noncomplia­nt again if it failed to follow a timeline for allowing access to Russian data and samples before Dec. 31. That data is crucial for adjudicati­ng hundreds of possible cases of cheating from years ago.

The decision brought renewed criticism of WADA, which had angered athletes and other antidoping officials by softening some of the demands it made of Russia.

Travis Tygart, chief executive of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, called the decision “a devastatin­g blow to the world’s clean athletes.”

Richard Pound, the IOC member who was the first president of WADA and who conducted an initial report on Russian doping in 2015, defended the deal as the only way to guarantee access to all the informatio­n necessary to pursue cases of cheating. The original requiremen­ts for reinstatem­ent did not explicitly state that the Russians must provide the computer records of each athlete’s cheating, the latest ones do. In exchange for that, WADA essentiall­y dropped its demand that Russia admit to state-sponsored doping.

“When you’re dealing with issues diplomatic­ally, sometimes you can’t go at them directly,” Pound said. “Sometimes by circling you get at it.”

Tygart and WADA’s other critics have long complained that the organizati­on includes too many leaders of sports organizati­ons with conflicted loyalties in positions of power. Six members of WADA’s 12-person executive committee have positions with an internatio­nal or national sports organizati­on.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States