Santa Fe New Mexican

‘IMMUTABLE'

Trump may limit how government defines one’s gender

- By Erica L. Green, Katie Benner and Robert Pear

The Trump administra­tion is considerin­g narrowly defining gender as a biological, immutable condition determined by genitalia at birth, the most drastic move yet in a government­wide effort to roll back recognitio­n and protection­s of transgende­r people under federal civil rights law.

A series of decisions by the Obama administra­tion loosened the legal concept of gender in federal programs, including in education and health care, recognizin­g gender largely as an individual’s choice and not determined by the sex assigned at birth. The policy prompted fights over bathrooms, dormitorie­s, single-sex programs and other arenas where gender was once seen as a simple concept. Conservati­ves, especially evangelica­l Christians, were incensed.

Now the Department of Health and Human Services is spearheadi­ng an effort to establish a legal definition of sex under Title IX, the federal civil rights law that bans gender discrimina­tion in education programs that receive government financial assistance, according to a memo obtained by the New York Times.

The department argued in its memo that key government agencies needed to adopt an explicit and uniform definition of gender as determined “on a biological basis that is clear, grounded in science, objective and administra­ble.” The agency would define sex as either male or female, unchangeab­le, and determined by the genitals that a person is born with, according to a draft reviewed by the Times. Any dispute would have to be clarified using genetic testing.

“Sex means a person’s status as male or female based on immutable biological traits identifiab­le by or before birth,” the department proposed in the memo, which was drafted and has been circulatin­g since last spring. “The sex listed on a person’s birth certificat­e, as originally issued, shall constitute definitive proof of a person’s sex unless rebutted by reliable genetic evidence.”

The new definition would essentiall­y eradicate federal recognitio­n of the estimated 1.4 million Americans who have opted to recognize themselves — surgically or otherwise — as a gender other than the one they were born into.

“This takes a position that what the medical community understand­s about their patients — what people understand about themselves — is irrelevant because the government disagrees,” said Catherine E. Lhamon, who led the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights in the Obama administra­tion and helped write transgende­r guidance that is being undone. The move would be the most significan­t of a series of maneuvers, large and small, to exclude the population from civil rights protection­s and roll back the Obama administra­tion’s more fluid recognitio­n of gender identity. The Trump administra­tion has sought to bar transgende­r people from serving in the military and has legally challenged civil rights protection­s for the group embedded in the nation’s health care law.

Several agencies have withdrawn Obamaera policies that recognized gender identity in schools, prisons and homeless shelters. The administra­tion even tried to remove questions about gender identity from a 2020 census survey and a national survey of elderly citizens.

For the last year, the Department of Health and Human Services has privately argued that the term “sex” was never meant to include gender identity or even homosexual­ity, and that the lack of clarity allowed the Obama administra­tion to wrongfully extend civil rights protection­s to people who should not have them.

Roger Severino, director of the Office for Civil Rights at the department, declined to answer detailed questions about the memo or his role in interagenc­y discussion­s about how to revise the definition of sex under Title IX.

But officials at the department confirmed that their push to limit the definition of sex for the purpose of federal civil rights laws resulted from their own reading of the laws and from a court decision.

“Transgende­r people are frightened,” said Sarah Warbelow, legal director of the Human Rights Campaign, which presses for the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgende­r people. “At every step where the administra­tion has had the choice, they’ve opted to turn their back on transgende­r people.” After this article was published online, transgende­r people took to social media to post photograph­s of themselves with the hashtag #WontBeEras­ed.

The Department of Health and Human Services has called on the “Big Four” agencies that enforce some part of Title IX — the Department­s of Education, Justice, Health and Human Services, and Labor — to adopt its definition in regulation­s that will establish uniformity in the government and increase the likelihood that courts will accept it.

 ??  ??
 ?? NEW YORK TIMES FILE PHOTO ?? Jasper Chagoyen, left, 15, who identifies as transgende­r/genderless, and Skylar Vlahakis, 16, who identifies as a transgende­r man, join hundreds of demonstrat­ors in 2017 outside of the Stonewall Inn in New York. The demonstrat­ors were protesting President Donald Trump’s decision to rescind an Obama administra­tion policy that protected the rights of students to use bathrooms correspond­ing to their gender identity.
NEW YORK TIMES FILE PHOTO Jasper Chagoyen, left, 15, who identifies as transgende­r/genderless, and Skylar Vlahakis, 16, who identifies as a transgende­r man, join hundreds of demonstrat­ors in 2017 outside of the Stonewall Inn in New York. The demonstrat­ors were protesting President Donald Trump’s decision to rescind an Obama administra­tion policy that protected the rights of students to use bathrooms correspond­ing to their gender identity.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States