Santa Fe New Mexican

Texas board to keep Clinton in social studies standards

- By Valerie Strauss

Hillary Clinton gets to stay after all. The people who decide what’s taught — and what’s not — in the schools of Texas declared that Clinton warrants a mention in the state’s social studies classes.

So does Moses — who is already in a high school U.S. government standard as someone, along with John Locke and others, “whose principles of laws and government institutio­ns informed the American founding documents.”

But former first lady Eleanor Roosevelt is out, and while the Texas Board of Education voted to finally, for the first time, include slavery as a “major” cause of the Civil War, it wouldn’t remove states’ rights as a cause, too (though historians note that states’ rights was a euphemism for slavery).

The board voted on big changes to its K-12 social studies standards after months of controvers­y about what would stay in and what would come out.

The changes in standards, which take effect for the next school year, exploded into public view in September when board members took a preliminar­y vote to remove several historical figures, including Clinton, the first female presidenti­al nominee from a major U.S. party as well as a former secretary of state, U.S. senator and first lady.

The board aimed to streamline the standards — though as is common in Texas, the debate became political, with educators and historians complainin­g that political views influenced some decisions.

A letter sent to the board and signed by nearly 200 scholars from colleges and universiti­es across the country called on the panel to correct historical distortion­s and align the standards with “settled historical knowledge.”

Among the actions the board took, spurning the recommenda­tions of scholars and historians:

Rejected amendments to remove the myth that defending “states’ rights” was a cause of the Civil War and failed to correct the false portrayal that opposition to civil rights progress came exclusivel­y from Southern Democrats.

The letter from the scholars says the standards effectivel­y resurrect the “Lost Cause” myth, “a long-discredite­d version of history first promoted in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to glorify the Confederat­e past and reinforce white supremacis­t policies such as the disenfranc­hisement of African Americans and Jim Crow segregatio­n.”

Rejected an amendment to remove Moses from a list of political thinkers who were major influences on the American founding documents. The standards say: “Identify the individual­s whose principles of laws and government institutio­ns informed the American founding documents, including those of Moses, William Blackstone, John Locke, and Charles de Montesquie­u.”

Rejected an amendment to correct a standard that suggests that separation of church and state isn’t a key constituti­onal principle.

Rejected a recommenda­tion to remove a reference to the “heroism” of the defenders of the Alamo, meaning, as a Board of Education release said: “Texas schoolchil­dren will still learn of the heroic ‘Victory or Death’ letter penned by Lt. Col. William Barret Travis while besieged in the Alamo.”

Clinton and Helen Keller stayed in the curriculum after at least one board member was besieged with phone calls about their removal.

But some other historical figures are being removed, including Eleanor Roosevelt and Republican Sen. Barry Goldwater, who ran for president in 1964.

Controvers­ies about Texas standards are hardly new.

Four years ago, scholarly reviews of 43 proposed history, geography and government textbooks found numerous inaccuraci­es, biases and exaggerati­on, such as:

The idea that Moses and Solomon inspired U.S. democracy.

That in the era of segregatio­n only “sometimes” were schools for black children “lower in quality.”

That Jews view Jesus Christ as an important prophet.

Carisa Lopez, political director of the nonprofit Texas Freedom Network (which describes itself as the “state’s watchdog for monitoring far-right issues, organizati­ons, money and leaders”), reacted to the latest vote by the board:

“When it comes to writing curriculum standards for our kids’ schools, it’s painfully clear that the personal beliefs of politician­s on the state board matter more than what countless historians and teachers have told them is factually true. Rather than teaching the truth, too many board members stubbornly mislead students on fundamenta­l facts from our nation’s history. Texas kids deserve a lot better than a politicize­d version of history that fuels so many of the divisions in our country today.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States