Santa Fe New Mexican

Taking the train to save the planet

Travelers rethinking how they get places amid ‘flight-shame’ movement in Europe

- By Michael Birnbaum

ISTOCKHOLM f he had hopped on a plane, Johan Hilm would have gotten from Sweden to Austria in two hours. Instead, the lanky Swede made an epic overland journey by rail, bus and ferry that took more than 30 hours.

He joined a growing crowd of Europeans who are spurning air travel out of concern for the environmen­t this summer.

Budget airlines such as Ireland’s Ryanair and British easyJet revolution­ized European travel two decades ago, when they first started offering to scoot people across the continent for as little as $20 a flight. But that mode of travel, once celebrated as an opening of the world, is now being recognized for its contributi­on to global problems.

Tourists have been spooked by the realizatio­n that one passenger’s share of the exhaust from a single flight can cancel out a year’s worth of Earthfrien­dly efforts. And so they are digging out their parents’ Europe-by-rail guidebooks and trading tips on the most convenient night train to Vienna.

Mark Smith, founder of Seat 61, a popular website dedicated to train-based travel around Europe and beyond, said he has noticed a change in the people coming to his site. When he set it up in 2001, users told him they loved trains, or were scared of flying, or couldn’t fly.

“Now, when people tell me why they are taking the train, they say two things in the same breath: They say they are fed up with the stress of flying, and they want to cut their carbon footprint,” Smith said.

So far, the biggest shift has been in green-conscious Sweden, where airline executives blame increased train travel — up one-third this summer compared with a year ago — for a

drop in air passenger traffic.

Swedish leaders this month announced they would inject new cash into the national rail company. They plan to build up a new fleet of trains after years of cutbacks when cheap plane tickets were luring people into the skies.

The newly coined concept of flygskam, or “flight shame,” has turned some Swedes bashful about their globe-trotting. A guerrilla campaign used Instagram to tally the planet-busting travels of top Swedish celebritie­s. Next door in Norway, meanwhile, the prime minister felt the need to assure citizens that they need not apologize for flying to see family in the high north.

Hilm, 31, a health care consultant who was on his way to hike across Austria for eight days, said he tried to live an environmen­tally responsibl­e life. “I don’t drive a car. I eat mostly vegetarian. I live in an apartment, not a big house.”

He was stunned when he assessed the impact of his flights. “I did one of those calculator­s you can do online,” he said, “and 80 percent of my emissions were from travel.

“I don’t want to say I’ll never fly again, but I do want to be conscious about the decisions I make,” Hilm added over coffee in the Stockholm-to-Copenhagen train’s bistro car. Little kids bounced on the squishy red banquette seats nearby. In the passenger compartmen­ts, some people dozed, others played card games. Out the window, cows looked up from their fields as the train hurtled through at 120 mph.

He left his Stockholm apartment before 6 a.m. on a Wednesday. He arrived at his Alpine destinatio­n after noon the next day.

What was it worth? Measuring carbon dioxide emissions from travel can be an inexact science. One popular online calculator suggested that Hilm’s trip would have led to about 577 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions if he had flown, compared with 118 pounds by rail, a savings of 80 percent.

In the first six months of 2019, air passenger traffic was down 3.8 percent in Sweden compared with the previous year. Climate concerns are among several reasons for the downturn, said Jean-Marie Skoglund, an aviation expert at the Swedish Transport Agency. He said a slowing economy, tax changes and an airline bankruptcy were other factors.

Across Europe, air travel still ticked up — by 4.4 percent — in the first quarter of 2019, according to figures from Airports Council Internatio­nal Europe, an industry group. But for young, green Europeans, saying no to flying is becoming a thing.

The shift has been inspired in part by Greta Thunberg, the 16-year-old Swedish climate campaigner who sparked a worldwide school strike and has been crisscross­ing Europe by train as she pressures politician­s to do more about the environmen­t. Thunberg has not been on a plane since 2015. She said she planned to travel soon to the United States — by sailboat.

“If you want to reduce your environmen­tal impact, the best thing you can do is to stop flying,” said Susanna Elfors, founder of a Facebook group called Tagsemeste­r, or Train Vacation, that has been credited with helping to spur train travel. Users exchange practical tips and cheer on each other’s journeys.

Anxiety about climate change is “playing a part, for sure,” in Sweden’s dropping air passenger traffic, said SAS chief executive Rickard Gustafson. He said the airline was pushing to expand its use of renewable fuels as quickly as possible.

He said, however, the world needs air travel.

“The society that we all enjoy, the wealth and the social security that we all have — without aviation, it would all collapse,” he said.

To be sure, there are limits to train travel. It can be time-consuming, and the transit is not always painless. Travelers on the Swedish Facebook group complain of trains without air conditioni­ng that turn into saunas and delays that cause missed connection­s.

Marcus Nygren and Linnea Rothin, a Swedish couple who just returned from a three-week rail trip around central Europe, said that on one stretch, they were crammed into a train compartmen­t with a woman who spoke neither the local language nor anything they could speak, and who was traveling with a vast assortment of baggage, including what appeared to be a sewing machine.

They also saw train travel as liberating.

“I’ve dreamed about going to an airport, looking at the board and saying, ‘OK, I want to go there.’ And that’s pretty much what we’ve done,” only by rail, said Nygren, 27.

They bought Pan-European Interrail passes and set out with only a first destinatio­n in mind. Then they improvised their way from the Czech Republic to Hungary to Austria to Croatia to Slovenia to Germany. It was the first time either had traveled that way.

Climate change experts caution that meaningful shifts will need to happen on a structural level going beyond any individual’s private actions.

“In terms of personal climate activism broadly, whether you’re talking about aviation, reducing the amount of meat you eat, consumptio­n choices, the answer is always: It is important, but it is insufficie­nt,” said Greg Carlock, a manager at the World Resources Institute, a Washington think tank.

Rail travelers say they simply want to lead climate-friendlier lives — and that they are delighted they already seem to have spurred a move to invest more in the Swedish rail system.

“You can do a lot of things on your own, but you also have to understand it’s part of the ecosystem,” Rothin said.

 ?? REBECKA UHLIN/FOR THE WASHINGTON POST ?? Johan Hilm, 31, passed through Copenhagen Central Station on a recent trip designed to avoid air travel. ‘I don’t want to say I’ll never fly again, but I do want to be conscious about the decisions I make,’ the Swede said.
REBECKA UHLIN/FOR THE WASHINGTON POST Johan Hilm, 31, passed through Copenhagen Central Station on a recent trip designed to avoid air travel. ‘I don’t want to say I’ll never fly again, but I do want to be conscious about the decisions I make,’ the Swede said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States