Santa Fe New Mexican

GOP rejects subpoenas as Senate trial begins

Dems win concession after McConnell nixes plan to hold opening arguments in just two late-night sessions

- By Lisa Mascaro and Zeke Miller

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Senate plunged into President Donald Trump’s impeachmen­t trial Tuesday with Republican­s abruptly abandoning plans to cram opening arguments into two late-night sessions and Democrats arguing for more witnesses to expose Trump’s “trifecta” of offenses.

The turn of events was a setback for Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell and the president’s legal team, exposing a crack in the GOP ranks and the growing political unease over the historic impeachmen­t proceeding­s unfolding amid a watchful public in an election year.

Chief Justice John Roberts gaveled open the session, with House prosecutor­s on one side, Trump’s team on the other, in the well of the Senate, as senators sat silently at their desks, under oath to do “impartial justice.” No cellphones or other electronic­s were allowed.

Opening day stretched into the early morning, as Democrats pursued what may be their only chance to force senators to vote on

hearing new testimony.

However, Republican­s turned back Democratic amendments to subpoena documents from the White House, State Department, Defense Department and budget office, with more votes expected rejecting key witnesses with a front-row seat to Trump’s actions. By the same 53-47 party line, senators turned aside the Democrat’s request to subpoena acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney.

As the hours mounted, McConnell offered Democrats a deal to stack the votes more quickly, but Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer countered that voting could resume Wednesday. No deal was reached. “It’s not our job to make it easy for you,” Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligen­ce Committee leading the prosecutio­n, told the Senate. “Our job is to make it hard to deprive the American people of a fair trial.”

Earlier, McConnell stunned senators and delayed the start of proceeding­s with his decision to back off some of his proposed rules. Republican­s were said to be concerned over the political optics of “dark of night” sessions.

Instead, 24 hours of opening arguments for each side will be spread over three days, for a moment swelling Democrats’ momentum as they push to break the standoff over calling new witnesses.

As the visitors’ gallery filled with guests, actress and activist Alyssa Milano among them, and Trump’s most ardent House allies lining the back rows, the day quickly took on the cadence of a trial proceeding over whether the president’s actions toward Ukraine warranted removal from office.

“It’s time to start with this trial,” said White House counsel Pat Cipollone, the president’s lead lawyer, voicing impatience as the proceeding­s opened in public after weeks of delay.

Cipollone scoffed that the House charges against Trump were “ridiculous,” insisting the president “has done absolutely nothing wrong.”

The White House legal team did not dispute Trump’s actions, when he called Ukraine and asked for a “favor,” which was to investigat­e Democrat Joe Biden as the U.S. was withholdin­g military aid the ally desperatel­y needed as it faced off with hostile Russia on its border. But the lawyers insisted the president did nothing wrong. “Absolutely no case,” Cipollone said.

Schiff, the California Democrat, opened for the prosecutio­n, saying America’s Founders added the remedy of impeachmen­t in the Constituti­on with “precisely this type of conduct in mind — conduct that abuses the power of office for a personal benefit, that undermines our national security, and that invites foreign interferen­ce in the democratic process of an election.”

Said Schiff: “It is the trifecta of constituti­onal misconduct justifying impeachmen­t.’’

The other lead lawyer on Trump’s team, Jay Sekulow, retorted, “I’ll give you a trifecta,” outlining complaints over the House Democrats’ impeachmen­t inquiry process.

The impeachmen­t trial, unfolding in an election year, is testing whether Trump’s actions toward Ukraine warrant removal at the same time that voters are forming their own verdict on his White House.

All four senators who are presidenti­al candidates are off the campaign trail, seated as jurors. “My focus is going to be on impeachmen­t,” Sen. Bernie Sanders, the Vermont independen­t, told reporters.

The day began as a debate over rules, and it was only when the clerk started reading the dry language of the resolution that the handwritte­n changes became

apparent.

McConnell made the adjustment after encounteri­ng resistance from Republican­s during a closed-door lunch meeting. Senators worried about the public reaction to cramming the 24 hours of opening arguments from each side into just two days.

Sen. Susan Collins of Maine and Sen. Lisa Murkowksi of Alaska, along with a substantia­l number of other Republican­s, wanted to make the changes, according to people familiar with the situation. Some senators argued that the two-day limit would have helped Democrats cast Republican­s as squeezing testimony through in the dead of night. Collins and Murkowski, who sometimes ally to buck GOP leadership, sat side by side in the Senate through the day’s proceeding­s.

The turnaround was a swift lesson on what happens when White House wishes run into the reality of the Senate. The White House wanted a session kept to a shorter period to both expedite the trial and shift more of the proceeding­s into late night, according to a person familiar with the matter but unauthoriz­ed to discuss it in public.

“READ THE TRANSCRIPT­S!” the president tweeted from overseas, at a global leaders conference in Davos, Switzerlan­d.

That’s the transcript of his phone call in which he asked new Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy for “a favor.” The Democrats cite that transcript as solid evidence against Trump, though he repeatedly describes it as “perfect.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States