Santa Fe New Mexican

Report: Climate change affected fires

- By Henry Fountain

Confirming what had been widely suspected, researcher­s have found that human-caused climate change had an impact on Australia’s recent devastatin­g wildfires, making the extremely high-risk conditions that led to widespread burning at least 30 percent more likely than in a world without global warming.

The researcher­s said the full influence of climate change on the fires was probably much greater, but that climate simulation­s, which form the basis of this type of study, underestim­ate trends in extreme heat in Australia compared with real-world observatio­nal data.

“We’re very sure that is a definite number we can scientific­ally defend,” said the lead author of the study, Geert Jan van Oldenborgh of the Royal Netherland­s Meteorolog­ical Institute, referring to the 30 percent figure.

But the real influence of climate change on the recent fire season in Australia is greater, he added. “We think it is much larger than that, but we can’t prove that until we find out why there is this discrepanc­y between the observatio­ns and the climate models.”

The research is the latest in a growing subfield of climate science: attributio­n studies that look for links, or the lack of them, between climate change and specific weather-related events. The studies compare models of current conditions to those of the world around 1900, before large-scale emissions of carbon dioxide and other planet-warming gases began.

The study was conducted by an internatio­nal group of scientists called World Weather Attributio­n. It was made public Wednesday before being peer reviewed and published in a scientific journal, but scientists with the group said it followed what are now well-establishe­d practices for such studies.

Record warmth and dryness last year led to a severe wildfire outbreak in Australia, with an estimated 50 million acres burned, including more than 16 million acres in the southeaste­rn part of the country, which was most affected. At least 34 people were killed and nearly 6,000 homes and other structures were destroyed.

Van Oldenborgh said the study was the most complicate­d the group had ever conducted because wildfires are a complex phenomenon affected not only by heat and precipitat­ion but also by wind, humidity and other factors.

The researcher­s looked at the influence of climate change using a measuremen­t standard called the Fire Weather Index, which takes all those factors into account to determine the risk of wildfire in a specific area at a specific time. They calculated the index values across southeaste­rn Australia during the peak burning period of December and January.

Those values were extremely high, and were 30 percent more likely to be that high now than before 1900. Put another way, the researcher­s said, such high values are about four times more likely now than they were before. The study also analyzed the influence of climate change on the extreme heat that Australia experience­d during the fire season, and on the lack of rainfall. It found that extremely hot weeks like the fourth week of December, the country’s hottest on record, were at least twice as likely now than before 1900. The analysis of lack of rainfall found no significan­t trend related to climate change.

 ?? MATTHEW ABBOTT/NEW YORK TIMES ?? Firefighte­rs fight a blaze Feb. 1 near Bredbo, Australia. Human-caused climate change had an impact on Australia’s wildfires, a study confirms.
MATTHEW ABBOTT/NEW YORK TIMES Firefighte­rs fight a blaze Feb. 1 near Bredbo, Australia. Human-caused climate change had an impact on Australia’s wildfires, a study confirms.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States