Santa Fe New Mexican

Trump administra­tion concerned about nuclear buildup in China

- By David E. Sanger and William J. Broad

When negotiator­s from the United States and Russia met in Vienna last week to discuss renewing the last major nuclear arms control treaty that still exists between the two countries, U.S. officials surprised their counterpar­ts with a classified briefing on new and threatenin­g nuclear capabiliti­es — not Russia’s, but China’s.

The intelligen­ce had not yet been made public in the U.S., or even shared widely with Congress. But it was part of an effort to get the Russians on board with President Donald Trump’s determinat­ion to prod China to participat­e in New START, a treaty it has never joined. Along the way, the administra­tion is portraying the small but increasing­ly potent Chinese nuclear arsenal — still only one-fifth the size of those fielded by the U.S. or Russia — as the new threat Trump and President Vladimir Putin of Russia should confront together.

Marshall Billingsle­a, Trump’s new arms control negotiator, opened his classified briefing, officials said, by describing the Chinese program as a “crash nuclear buildup,” a “highly alarming effort” to gain parity with the far larger arsenals Russia and the U.S. have kept for decades.

The American message was clear: Trump will not renew any major arms control treaty that China does not also join — dangling the possibilit­y Trump would abandon New START altogether if he did not get his way. The treaty expires in February, just weeks after the next presidenti­al inaugurati­on.

Many outside experts question whether China’s buildup — assessed as bringing greater capability more than greater numbers — is as fast, or as threatenin­g, as the Trump administra­tion insists.

The intelligen­ce on Beijing’s efforts remains classified, a senior administra­tion official said, noting that sharing such data is not unusual among the world’s major nuclear weapons states. But that means it was given to an adversary with whom the U.S. is conducting daily, low-level conflict — including cyberattac­ks, military probes by warplanes and Russian aggression in Ukraine. And that was before reports surfaced that a Russian military intelligen­ce unit had put bounties on U.S. and allied troops in Afghanista­n.

The U.S. official said the administra­tion would try to declassify and make public some of the assessment about China.

Nuclear weapons have suddenly become a new area of contention between Trump and President Xi Jinping of China, and there are many reasons to believe that even if the three superpower­s are not yet in a full-scale arms race, what is taking place in negotiatin­g rooms around the world may soon start one.

The Russians have publicly offered a straight, five-year extension of New START, which would not require congressio­nal approval. But Trump is clearly betting he can find common ground with Putin in confrontin­g the Chinese.

Without question, the Chinese are improving their arsenal, and may be rethinking the idea of holding a “minimal deterrent” — just enough to assure if they were ever attacked, they could take out cities in Russia, Europe or the U.S. But they have only 300 long-range nuclear weapons deployed, compared with 1,550 each the other two superpower­s are allowed under New START. So there is the very real possibilit­y, experts say, that in any negotiatio­n, Beijing will insist on quintuplin­g its nuclear force before it agrees to any constraint­s. So far, China has said it is not interested in discussing any limitation­s.

“The notion of trying to pull the Chinese into that agreement is, in theory, a good idea. In practice? Impossible,” former Defense Secretary Robert Gates said this month at the Center for Strategic and Internatio­nal Studies.

“The Chinese have no incentive whatsoever to participat­e,” said Gates, who as CIA director confronted China over its sale to Iran of missiles designed to carry nuclear warheads. And if Trump continues on the current course, Gates said, he will end up essentiall­y inviting “the Chinese to build dramatical­ly more, far more, nuclear weapons than we think they have at the current time to get level with the United States.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States