Santa Fe New Mexican

Unthinkabl­e: Migrant family separation, again?

-

Apparently undeterred by the uproar it triggered by separating migrant children from their families two years ago, the Trump administra­tion is considerin­g whether to push for more of the same. Again, teens, tweens, toddlers and babies may be removed from their parents as a means of deterring further illegal immigratio­n. Again, the president’s unbridled animus toward mainly brown-skinned migrants may result in an episode of cruelty that would shock the civilized world.

The administra­tion’s latest threat to break up families arises from a federal court order last month by U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee in Los Angeles. Gee, alarmed at the rapid spread of the novel coronaviru­s at family detention centers run by U.S. Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t, gave the agency until Friday to release scores of children held at the facilities. The judge’s jurisdicti­on in the long-running case does not cover detained adults, which afforded an opening to the administra­tion to present migrant parents with a perverse choice: give up their children to sponsors or remain with their children inside facilities where the pandemic is tightening its grip. In a separate lawsuit brought by parents, the administra­tion says that if forced to release children, it may not free their parents with them.

Splitting up families would once have seemed unthinkabl­e in most such cases, with the rare exception of migrant parents who might be criminals or abusive. In the Trump administra­tion, it is all too thinkable — despite the trauma it imposes on children. Under cover of the pandemic, the White House has choked off legal and illegal immigratio­n, and suspended the decadeslon­g system of asylum under which persecuted individual­s could apply for refuge in the United States. Since the spring, more than 2,000 unaccompan­ied minors who crossed the border hoping for asylum have been summarily expelled.

The virus has already gained a foothold in two family detention centers in Texas run by ICE, where detainees and employees have tested positive. The contagion at the Texas centers, where CDC-recommende­d precaution­s are enforced spottily, prompted Gee to conclude that the facilities “are ‘on fire’ and there is no more time for half-measures.”

Despite her ruling, the government now seeks to prolong those half-measures. Administra­tion lawyers argue that officials should be required only to address health and safety violations at the facilities, not release detainees. That’s a fair argument in theory; in practice, ICE has had months to comply with guidelines to protect staff and detainees from COVID-19 but has failed to. Beyond the family detention centers it runs, where some 280 parents and children are housed, it holds more than 17,000 migrants at other facilities nationwide; of those, nearly 3,000 have tested positive for the virus, in addition to several dozen ICE employees.

The United States is a fundamenta­lly compassion­ate and decent country. Compassion and decency compel a clear path forward: releasing parents and children together from ICE custody. Sadly, very little in this administra­tion’s makeup suggests it will do the right thing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States