Santa Fe New Mexican

Don’t let unemployme­nt benefits expire

-

There is a good chance that because of congressio­nal inaction, the $600 per week additional unemployme­nt benefit that’s been in place throughout the pandemic-induced recession will expire at the end of this month, if not sooner (for technical reasons, the last benefit checks go out July 25).

To label this as political malpractic­e is way too polite.

I’d argue it’s one of the most egregious examples of dysfunctio­nal, destructiv­e politics in an era when such examples abound.

It will hurt the most economical­ly vulnerable people at a time when, even with recent gains, the number of job seekers exceeds jobs by a wide margin. More than 30 million people are receiving unemployme­nt benefits right now, and this problem of oversuppli­ed, underdeman­ded labor is getting worse, not better.

Because the coronaviru­s is spreading at a newly accelerate­d rate, leading to yet another round of retrenched commerce, employment gains appear to be shifting into reverse.

Ending the higher benefits will also hurt the overall economy, and in a big way. On an annualized basis, the loss of the $600 plus up would leave a hole of more than $800 billion, almost 4 percent of GDP in an economy that’s struggling to reopen.

But really, to blame congressio­nal inaction for this potential debacle is far too vague. As Politico put it, the benefits expire “if lawmakers follow Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s proposed timeline for the next round of pandemic aid.” This timeline is completely inconsiste­nt with comments McConnell, R-Ky., made a few weeks back, when he touted a wait-and-see attitude as to whether another relief package would be warranted. It would take some time, he cautioned, to “see what’s working, see what isn’t.”

Well, we’ve waited, and we’ve seen: The virus is spreading faster than ever, and that’s posing a serious threat to the recovery. The rationale for sustained unemployme­nt insurance benefits remains strong, a fact with which McConnell himself appears to agree. Earlier this week, he told reporters, “When my members come back next week, we’ll start socializin­g [unemployme­nt insurance plans] with them.”

Sorry, but the time for socializin­g has long passed. The only explanatio­ns for the lapse are lethargy, dysfunctio­n and a checked-out cluelessne­ss as to what most people are going through right now — perfectly in keeping with the Trump White House’s “find something new!” campaign, which tells the unemployed to just get out there, get a new skill and find an exciting new job. (They neglect to mention that the unemployme­nt rate, at 11.1 percent, is still higher than the worst month of the last recession.)

I understand that Republican­s want to consider alternativ­es to the expiring $600 weekly plus-up. The Washington Post reported this week that “with the benefits soon set to expire and the economy showing new signs of strain,” the Trump administra­tion was open to some version of another expansion, though at a lower level than the current $600 a week, as they worry that that amount will incentiviz­e workers to reject jobs at lower incomes.

That’s a reasonable debate to have, though again, the problem facing job seekers isn’t too much unemployme­nt insurance; it’s not enough jobs. Work disincenti­ves are only binding when there’s work.

But what’s not reasonable is to be having this debate when benefits are lapsing.

Ever since the plus-up in benefits passed as part of the CARES Act in late March, the July deadline was etched in stone.

With the pandemic respiking, a complete national leadership vacuum on virus control, the economy sort of opening and now sort of closing again, the open question of what’s happening with schools and the absence of child care options if schools fail to restart fully, people are already suffering tremendous uncertaint­y and insecurity.

For congressio­nal Republican­s to pile on by letting crucially important benefits expire — even for a few weeks while they “socialize” their way toward some solution — is completely unacceptab­le.

They need to stop messing around, grasp the urgency of the moment and fix this before July 25.

Jared Bernstein, chief economist to former Vice President Joe Biden, is a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. This was first published by the Washington Post.

 ??  ?? COMMENTARY
COMMENTARY

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States