Santa Fe New Mexican

Ex-cop faces trial in chokehold death; DA ducks out

- Ringside Seat is an opinion column about people, politics and news. Contact Milan Simonich at msimonich@sfnewmexic­an.com or 505-986-3080.

One day last week, Christophe­r Smelser was a former Las Cruces police officer charged with involuntar­y manslaught­er in the asphyxiati­on of a prisoner.

A conviction would forever end his career in law enforcemen­t, but the charge carried relatively little time. The maximum penalty for involuntar­y manslaught­er is 18 months in prison.

The next day, Doña Ana County District Attorney Mark D’Antonio withdrew from the case.

Instead, Smelser will face new prosecutor­s from the state Attorney General’s Office. And they have upgraded the charge against Smelser to second-degree murder.

At once the stakes became higher for Smelser and lower for D’Antonio.

Smelser could serve nine years in prison if he’s found guilty of murdering Antonio Valenzuela with a chokehold. D’Antonio no longer has to worry about prosecutin­g a cop in his own jurisdicti­on.

But D’Antonio should be embarrasse­d. A case he was happy to hand off is now a prosecutio­n for murder.

Rather than doing his job, D’Antonio will let someone else do it for him.

All too often, district attorneys don’t want to be adversaria­l with police officers. Prosecutor­s rely on cops to obtain conviction­s, and conviction­s are the statistic district attorneys use most often in their reelection campaigns.

Farming out high-profile cases in which a police officer is the defendant is the politicall­y expedient course of inaction. Let someone from afar handle the case so as not to anger or alienate the hometown police force.

While Smelser digested the latest developmen­t in his case, D’Antonio and state Attorney General Hector Balderas teamed up for a news statement.

Balderas gave a no-nonsense explanatio­n of his staff ’s role.

“We are taking over prosecutio­n and focusing on appropriat­e charges for violent and dangerous chokeholds,” he said.

By comparison, D’Antonio’s stated reasons for giving up the case were windy and dense.

“My office maintains the integrity of the fair trial process, in the continuati­on of our efforts to insure justice is served for the victims and defendants. Since this incident occurred, Attorney General Hector Balderas and his staff have been in contact with my office regarding this case, as well as police and law enforcemen­t reforms and accountabi­lity for the use of deadly force including the ban placed on chokehold restraint techniques. In the pursuit for justice and given the seriousnes­s of the charges against Las Cruces Police Officer Smelser, we agreed that this case be adopted and prosecuted by the New Mexico Attorney General.”

I asked D’Antonio’s spokeswoma­n for clarity on why the district attorney turned the case over to another prosecutor.

She responded in writing: “The 3rd District Attorney’s office must maintain the integrity of a Fair Trial Process and continue efforts to insure justice is served for the Defendant, Las Cruces Police Officer Smelser, and the Victim, Antonio Valenzuela, in this homicide case.”

I followed up, asking how the integrity of a trial would have been harmed if D’Antonio had stayed on the case.

His spokeswoma­n replied: “Christophe­r Smelser is/was an officer for the Las Cruces Police Department. Our office has several cases in which Officer Smelser is a potential witness in the prosecutio­n of those cases, it is by that determinat­ion that the integrity of the trial process be fair and impartial.”

Everyone knows it’s unlikely Smelser will be called as a prosecutio­n witness while he is facing a homicide charge. Even if he wanted to cooperate, a good defense

attorney would undercut his testimony.

From a political standpoint, the district attorney’s job becomes easier by bowing out of prosecutin­g Smelser.

But this approach damages public confidence in the system. It’s one reason many people are reluctant to file a complaint against an abusive police officer. Unless someone is dead or maimed, a prosecutor might not move against a cop named in a citizen complaint.

Someone had to prosecute Smelser, given video evidence of his conduct.

Outdoors on the night of Feb. 29, Smelser and other officers struggled to handcuff 40-year-old Valenzuela. Tensions escalated.

Then Smelser said: “I’m going to [expletive] choke you out, bro.”

About two minutes later, Smelser announced to other officers, “Yeah, he’s out,” meaning unconsciou­s.

Valenzuela died on the spot of what a medical examiner called “asphyxial injuries.”

D’Antonio would not have abandoned a similar case with civilian combatants. Only because Smelser was a police officer did D’Antonio want out.

In the clichéd world of politics, district attorneys like to say they will be tough but fair.

In the real world of courthouse­s, campaign promises are forgotten or discarded, like last year’s indictment­s.

 ??  ?? Milan Simonich Ringside Seat
Milan Simonich Ringside Seat

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States