Santa Fe New Mexican

Vaccine rollout could ease crisis, but who gets it first?

One analysis argues for giving it to people affected most by virus

- By Carla K. Johnson and Nicky Forster

Getting a COVID-19 vaccine to the right people could change the course of the pandemic in the United States. But who are the right people?

As the decision looms for President-elect Joe Biden’s incoming administra­tion, a new analysis argues for targeting the first vaccines to the same low-income Black, Hispanic and Native American households that have disproport­ionately suffered from the coronaviru­s. But no one at the federal level has committed to the idea, which would be a significan­t shift from the current population-based method adopted by Operation Warp Speed.

“It’s not just a math problem. It’s a question of implementi­ng a major social justice commitment,” said Harald Schmidt, a medical ethicist at the University of Pennsylvan­ia, who compared the strategies with colleagues from the Massachuse­tts Institute of Technology and Boston College. The Associated Press conducted an independen­t analysis of the findings and worked with the team to estimate how many disadvanta­ged people would benefit.

If the shots get to the right people, Schmidt argues, the benefits could extend to the entire nation: Fewer people would get sick, hospital capacity would improve and more of the economy could reopen. Lives would be saved.

In October, a panel advising the federal government suggested setting aside 10 percent of the vaccine supply to distribute as an extra boost to the states with greater shares of disadvanta­ged groups. But the idea from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineerin­g and Medicine has been largely ignored.

The strategy could get vaccines to 12.3 million more vulnerable people in the early phases of distributi­on compared with the population-based method, the AP found in a collaborat­ion with Schmidt’s team.

Any distributi­on system will reverberat­e across the nation, with consequenc­es for everyone. It will be shaped by the early steps of federal officials and by state leaders who will allocate vaccines in the months when there is not enough supply to go around. California and several other states have stated that they intend to direct some of their supply to disadvanta­ged neighborho­ods, but there’s no national strategy to do so.

The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Robert Redfield, said Thursday that he looks forward to recommenda­tions that prioritize people 70 and older who live with younger relatives. “Often our Hispanic, Black and tribal nations families care for their elderly in multigener­ational households, and they are also at significan­t risk,” Redfield said in a statement.

Redfield has approved initial recommenda­tions that put health care personnel and residents of long-term care facilities at the front of the line.

No vaccine has been authorized for use yet in the U.S., but the preliminar­y results of ongoing clinical trials have been encouragin­g for Moderna’s and Pfizer’s candidates.

Operation Warp Speed officials announced last week that states would receive vaccine in proportion to their adult population­s, at least for the first 6.4 million doses and possibly beyond.

“We thought it best to keep it simple,” Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar said. “We thought that would be the fairest approach, the most consistent.”

Fairness isn’t that simple, Schmidt said. “Allocating vaccines to states according to population does not help reduce inequity,” Schmidt said. Vulnerable people will face more rationing in states such as New Mexico that have higher shares of vulnerable people. “That’s not fair.”

Vaccines will remain in limited supply for a time after Biden is sworn in, so rationing will continue into the spring.

“I think it’s early to say what the Biden and Harris administra­tion will ultimately do on that front,” said Dr. Marcella Nunez-Smith, associate dean for health equity research at Yale University’s medical school. She co-chairs Biden’s advisory board on the pandemic and has been a leading voice on reducing health disparitie­s for the transition.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States