Santa Fe New Mexican

Brexit already seems out of touch

- By Mark Landler

It took 11 grueling months for negotiator­s from Britain and the European Union to hammer out the terms of a post-Brexit trade deal. But in many respects, the deal is already 4½ years out of date.

The world has changed radically since June 2016, when a narrow majority in Britain voted to leave the EU, tempted by an argument that the country would prosper by throwing off the bureaucrat­ic shackles of Brussels.

The vision of an independen­t Britain — free to develop profitable, next-generation industries and cut its own trade deals with the United States, China and others — was an alluring sales pitch. The buccaneers of Brexit promised a “Global Britain.”

That was before the anti-immigrant and anti-globalist-fueled rise of President Donald Trump and other populist leaders who erected barriers to trade and immigratio­n and countries turned inward. It was before the coronaviru­s pandemic exposed the vulnerabil­ities of far-flung supply chains, fueling calls to bring strategic industries back home and throwing globalism into retreat.

In the dawn of 2021, buccaneers are out of fashion. The world is now dominated by three gargantuan economic blocs — the United States, China and the European Union. Britain has finalized its divorce from one of them, leaving it isolated at a time when the path forward seems perilous. “The whole ‘Global Britain’ model doesn’t reflect the more protection­ist, nationalis­tic world we’re living in,” said Thomas Wright, director of the Center on the United States and Europe at the Brookings Institutio­n. “Becoming a global free trader in 2016 is a bit like turning into a communist in 1989. It’s bad timing.”

As Prime Minister Boris Johnson leads Britain into a post-Brexit future, he also risks being out of step politicall­y.

The Brexit agreement with the European Union comes at the very moment that President-elect Joe Biden is replacing Trump’s “America First” credo with a message of mending alliances and collaborat­ing to tackle issues like global health and climate change.

While the deal averts tariffs and quotas on goods crossing the English Channel, it is at heart about disentangl­ing neighbors who had become deeply integrated over four decades. That estrangeme­nt, analysts say, is bound to weaken ties between the two sides in other areas, like security and diplomacy.

“Biden wants to see alliances and multilater­alism and cooperatio­n, and Brexit runs completely against that,” said Mujtaba Rahman, an analyst at the Eurasia Group, a political risk consultanc­y.

“Brexit is graduating into a more difficult political context where it is running against the grain.”

Trump cheered Britain’s drive to sever itself from the European Union. As a reward, he promised to negotiate a trade agreement with Johnson, whom he cultivated personally. But Biden opposed Brexit and has ruled out negotiatin­g new trade agreements until the United States improves its own competitiv­e position. That nullifies one of the prime selling points of Brexit.

Johnson has pivoted by highlighti­ng other ways that Britain can work with the United States. It is increasing military spending to reinforce NATO and playing host at a U.N. climate summit next year, which will give Biden a platform to reengage the United States in the climate challenge.

Britain has also promoted itself as a champion of democratic values in places like Hong Kong. But now it may not find many allies for that kind of work.

“Who are the obvious partners for them?” Wright said. “Four years ago, they could have said Brazil, but Brazil is now run by Bolsonaro,” he added, referring to the populist president, Jair Bolsonaro.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States