Santa Fe New Mexican

Trump signs pandemic relief bill

Measure provides billions of dollars for vaccine distributi­on, economic assistance; averts shutdown of government

- By Emily Cochrane, Nelson D. Schwartz and Gillian Friedman

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Sunday abruptly signed a measure providing $900 billion in pandemic aid and funding the government through September, ending last-minute turmoil he had created over legislatio­n that will offer an economic lifeline to millions of Americans and avert a government shutdown.

The legislativ­e package will provide billions of dollars for the distributi­on of vaccines, funds for schools, small businesses, hospitals and American families, and money needed to keep the government open for the remainder of the fiscal year. The enactment came less than 48 hours before the government would have shut down and just days before an eviction moratorium and other critical pandemic relief provisions were set to expire.

But it also came after two critical unemployme­nt programs lapsed, guaranteei­ng a delay in benefits for millions of unemployed Americans.

The crisis was one of Trump’s own making, after he blindsided lawmakers and White House officials with a videotaped implicit threat Tuesday to veto the package, which his top deputies

had helped negotiate and which had cleared both chambers of Congress with overwhelmi­ng bipartisan support nearly a week ago. The 5,593-page legislatio­n was flown to Florida, where the president is spending the winter holidays, on Thursday and has been waiting for Trump’s signature since.

Having been largely on the sidelines during monthslong negotiatio­ns, the president suddenly threatened to withhold his signature with an unexpected demand to more than triple the $600 direct payments to $2,000 and with criticism over some government funding provisions that provided foreign aid. But Republican­s had insisted on curtailing the size of the direct payments to accommodat­e conservati­ve concerns about the size of the package, and the provisions Trump singled out were in line with the president’s budget request this year.

Even as he acquiesced to bipartisan pleas to sign the legislatio­n, the president issued a series of demands for congressio­nal action, though lawmakers showed little immediate eagerness to embrace them with just six days left in the session.

“I will sign the omnibus and COVID package with a strong message that makes clear to Congress that wasteful items need to be removed,” Trump said in a statement late Sunday, saying he would send a formal request asking for some of the funds to be removed. But the 25-day time frame for considerin­g such a request will collide with the inaugurati­on of President-elect Joe Biden on Jan. 20, and House Democrats said they do not plan to vote on the request.

“The House Appropriat­ions Committee has jurisdicti­on over rescission­s, and our Democratic majority will reject any rescission­s submitted by President Trump,” said Rep. Nita Lowey of New York, chairwoman of the House Appropriat­ions Committee. “By turning the page on this request, we will allow the Biden-Harris administra­tion to begin to build back better.”

Trump claimed in his statement that the Senate would “start the process for a vote” on legislatio­n that would increase direct payments and address a provision that would repeal a legal shield for social media companies that he has tried to force into a sweeping military policy bill. The president, who has been consumed with false claims of voter fraud since his election loss, also claimed that Congress would take up the issue, a certain nonstarter for Democrats, who control the House.

House Democrats plan Monday to vote on legislatio­n that would provide for $2,000 direct payments, with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi saying Trump should “immediatel­y call on congressio­nal Republican­s to end their obstructio­n” and support the measure. Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York, the Senate minority leader, said he would move to pass the bill in the Senate, but such a maneuver would require Republican support.

But during the negotiatio­ns, Senate Republican­s have resisted increasing the payments, citing concerns about the deficit. In a statement applauding the president’s signature, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Senate majority leader, made no mention of the $2,000 payments or any of the president’s assertions about the next steps for the chamber he controls.

“I applaud President Trump’s decision to get hundreds of billions of dollars of crucial COVID19 relief out the door and into the hands of American families as quickly as possible,” McConnell said, without any mention of the delay Trump caused.

While the legislatio­n provides for expanded and extended unemployme­nt benefits, Trump’s delay in signing allowed two critical programs to lapse this weekend and guarantees a delay in benefits for millions of Americans who had relied on the income. The legislatio­n provides for a weekly $300 federal benefit — about half the original benefit establishe­d in the March stimulus law — for 11 weeks, and extends the two programs.

With state unemployme­nt agencies waiting for federal guidance on how to put the new legislatio­n in place, it is unclear how quickly those programs could resume and whether the benefits would be retroactiv­e to accommodat­e the delay. Because unemployme­nt benefits are processed weekly and the legislatio­n was not signed before the beginning of the week, it is likely that workers in most states will lose a week of benefits under the expanded program, as well as a week with the $300 supplement­al benefit.

“They might get it at the back end, but there are bills tomorrow,” said Michele Evermore, a senior policy analyst for the National Employment Law Project, a nonprofit workers rights group. “It’s just so frustratin­g that he couldn’t have figured this out yesterday. One day of delay is catastroph­e for millions.”

The delay also jeopardize­d the time frame for distributi­ng the $600 direct payments to most American adults, which Steven Mnuchin, the Treasury secretary, had initially promised could be distribute­d as early as this week.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States