Santa Fe New Mexican

Palace ‘saddened’ over Harry and Meghan interview

Royal family says it will address couple’s allegation­s ‘privately’

- By Isabella Kwai and Elian Peltier

LONDON — Buckingham Palace broke nearly 48 hours of silence Tuesday about a bombshell interview with Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, saying “the whole royal family is saddened” and expressing concern about the issue of racism the couple had raised.

Assertions that a member of the royal family had raised concerns about the skin color of the couple’s son, Archie, and that a desperate Meghan had contemplat­ed suicide dominated national discussion in Britain, where the interview with Oprah Winfrey was broadcast Monday evening.

On Tuesday, Piers Morgan, the co-host of Good Morning

Britain on ITV news, who came under attack for saying he “didn’t believe a word” of the interview, resigned, the network said. Britain’s communicat­ions regulator received more than 41,000 complaints about his comment, it said.

The two developmen­ts capped a day of nearly uninterrup­ted coverage around the interview, which was described by one British outlet as a “velvet-covered knife into the heart of the modern monarchy” and which observers say may have damaging and long-lasting consequenc­es for the reputation of the royal family.

In a brief statement, Buckingham Palace said that the issues raised by the couple, “particular­ly that of race,” were concerning. It didn’t deny the allegation­s and said that “while some recollecti­ons may vary, they are taken very seriously and will be addressed by the family privately.”

Although measured, the statement contained some unusually strong language for Buckingham Palace. In saying that the allegation­s would be addressed privately, it also indicated that the family would deal with the aftermath of the interview, and the bruised relationsh­ip that Meghan and Harry exposed, behind closed doors.

Yet the front pages, podcasts and countless analyses and opinion pieces about the interview heralded days, if not more, of national discussion ahead in Britain. More than 11 million people, in a country of 66 million, watched the interview Monday, according to ITV.

Throughout the day, British media questioned who had made the racist comment about the couple’s son. Winfrey indicated after the interview that Harry had asked her to let the public know that it was neither Queen Elizabeth II, nor her husband, Prince Philip.

During the interview, Harry said he had spoken to his grandmothe­r more in the last year than for many years, and Meghan said she had called the queen when she learned that Prince Philip had been hospitaliz­ed last month.

“Harry, Meghan and Archie will always be much loved family members,” Buckingham Palace said at the end of the statement.

For some people, the interview, first aired in the United States on

Sunday evening by CBS, offered a damning indictment of the royal family at a time when addressing racial inequality has commanded global attention. To others, it amounted to a slanted assault on an iconic British institutio­n, with its beloved head, the queen, in the twilight of her reign and her husband in the hospital.

Amid news media reports of a palace in turmoil, with the queen demanding more time to craft a response, there was no shortage of voices from across the political spectrum. Mental health advocates, racial equality activists and even some members of Meghan’s family weighed in, notably her estranged father, Thomas Markle, who gave an interview to ITV’s Morgan, one of his daughter’s fiercest critics.

Later in the show, Morgan stormed off the set after his co-host, Alex Beresford, took him to task for continuing to “trash” Meghan.

Hours later, ITV said in a statement that “following discussion­s with ITV, Piers Morgan has decided now is the time to leave

Good Morning Britain.”

Opposition lawmakers backed by racial equality activists have called the allegation­s of racism and prejudice distressin­g and said the claims should be investigat­ed.

“Post-pandemic, post-Black Lives Matter, this is the time where we are challengin­g old systems, old structures,” Ateh Jewel, a journalist and diversity advocate, said on Good Morning Britain.

“I believe Meghan when she says — and Prince Harry — when they talk about institutio­nal racism, because I’ve experience­d it,” she said.

Meghan and Harry attracted their share of critics as well, with many decrying the interview as a self-serving assault on the royal family that could weaken the monarchy.

“Harry is blowing up his family,” Zac Goldsmith, a Conservati­ve official, wrote on Twitter. “What Meghan wants, Meghan gets.”

Others questioned the newsworthi­ness of the interview, which has dominated discussion on both sides of the Atlantic since it was first broadcast.

Defenders of the British tabloid press, which carried on a yearslong feud with the couple and which Harry has flatly called racist, also spoke out against what they viewed as an attack.

“The U.K. media is not bigoted and will not be swayed from its vital role holding the rich and powerful to account,” Ian Murray, executive of the Society of Editors, wrote in a statement. He added that it was “strange indeed” that the couple had taken issue with the British press for intrusions into private lives but opened up to U.S. media.

In the first public appearance of a member of the royal family since the interview aired in Britain, Harry’s father, Prince Charles, visited a vaccinatio­n center in north London on Tuesday but did not reply to a question about what he had thought of the interview.

 ??  ?? Meghan, Duchess of Sussex
Meghan, Duchess of Sussex
 ??  ?? Prince Harry
Prince Harry

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States