Santa Fe New Mexican

New Orleans power outage shows need to upgrade the grid

- Rob Verchick, a law professor at Loyola University New Orleans, is the author of Facing Catastroph­e: Environmen­tal Action for a Post-Katrina World. This was originally published by the Washington Post. ROB VERCHICK

Ask just about any New Orleanian to name the most exasperati­ng thing about the aftermath of Hurricane Ida, and you’ll get the same answer. It isn’t the floodwater. Or the roof damage. It’s something more familiar but equally as threatenin­g to life, health and property: power failure.

This week, Entergy, Louisiana’s largest power company, warned customers to brace for several days or even weeks without power. That means no light, no microwave oven, no refrigerat­or — and getting by on candles and canned food. It means no air conditioni­ng amid an often triple-digit heat index, no computer and no internet, unless you can get online with a smartphone — which you don’t have power to charge. Gas stations are closed because electric pumps can’t pump. In some neighborho­ods, toilets don’t flush because sewage plants have conked out.

The problem started soon after Ida made landfall, when all eight of the region’s high-voltage transmissi­on lines failed. In one instance, a 400-foot-tall transmissi­on tower supporting power lines spanning the length of more than 10 football fields across the Mississipp­i River crumpled like a foil candy wrapper.

When Hurricane Katrina drowned the city and killed power across the southern parishes 16 years ago, we learned only half the lesson. The federal government invested nearly $15 billion to build a formidable flood-protection system.

This system defended the city admirably against Ida’s immediate danger. But the government did not pay similar attention to the power grid, and we’re feeling the pain now.

The nation’s aging electricit­y network is startlingl­y susceptibl­e to disaster nearly everywhere. Climate change, which intensifie­s floods, storms and wildfires, multiplies the risk. Ida is only the most recent siren to blow.

In the past five years in the United States, storms have smashed or drowned parts of the grid in Texas (Hurricane Harvey in 2017; the winter freeze this year); the Southeast (Hurricane Irma in 2017); and, most tragically, in Puerto Rico, where Hurricane Maria knocked out 80 percent of the island’s electricit­y network in 2017, and 11 months passed before power was fully restored.

Making “the grid” more resilient is challengin­g because it is not a single entity but rather a conglomera­tion of thousands of power plants, millions of miles of cable and tens of millions of consumers. Some failures, as with Ida, relate to high-voltage transmissi­on. Others, as in Texas this winter, involve fuel production and power generation, mainly with natural gas.

That said, the resilience recipe is simple.

First, harden the grid by armoring equipment against weather-related damage. Next, smarten the grid by updating technology to increase the network’s flexibilit­y and responsive­ness. Finally, green the grid by integratin­g renewable sources into new and existing networks.

Many wind and solar facilities survive storm conditions more successful­ly than their carbon-burning cousins. And obviously they don’t emit greenhouse gases that contribute to the storm-worsening climate change.

Grid modernizat­ion by the federal government is essential. The American Society of Civil Engineers estimates that, given current trends, the electricit­y network will need about $500 billion in additional upgrades by 2040 to keep the U.S. economy sound. The current bipartisan infrastruc­ture bill in Congress, backed by President Joe Biden, provides a necessary first step, with a $65 billion investment in power infrastruc­ture that includes resilient transmissi­on lines to support renewable energy.

State government­s can help, too, by revising the revenue models they impose on electric utilities. Current models, inherited from the early 20th century, reward investment­s in network expansion over modernizat­ion. Few directly encourage utilities to take into account future climate-based threats, such as rising seas or stronger storms. Instead, most utilities prepare their towers and substation­s for the weather trends of the past, then hope for the best. If states linked utility rate increases to preparing for climate change and greening the grid, utilities would follow along.

I’m lucky to have what few members of my community do: a home generator. Its furious thrumming keeps the lights on and draws a stream of neighbors stopping by to cool off, recharge batteries or refrigerat­e bottles of medicine.

But that shouldn’t be necessary. A resilient power grid would keep the power and lights on even during a natural disaster. We all can have it if we pull together as a society and plan ahead.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States