Santa Fe New Mexican

Reader concerned about her sobriety

- Send your questions for Annie Lane to dearannie@creators.com. To find out more about Annie Lane and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonist­s, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators. com.

Dear Annie: I’m currently in recovery. I have had two years of being clean and sober, after 13 long, miserable years of addiction. I have a full-time job that I love and am advancing, in my own place, and just live a good, “normal” life. I am quite happy in my current state and have made peace with my past. I’ve realized it was a tough lesson but one that has made me a better person today for having experience­d it.

However, during my active addiction, I married someone who was also an addict. We had been friends for several years, and it just seemed to naturally progress to the point where we wanted to have a life together. Two weeks after we got married, both he and I went to jail.

I’ve since done my time and completely changed my life. My husband is still in prison. I have thought seriously about getting divorced, as we were both actively using throughout our entire relationsh­ip. He says he has changed and wants to live life without using, but I am terrified that he will get out and start getting high.

I don’t want to live that lifestyle and am not willing to put my recovery in jeopardy. I can’t even truly say I still love him, and he doesn’t even know this new person that I have grown to become. Should I follow through with the divorce? Or see what happens when he gets out? — Recovering but Conflicted

Dear Recovering but Conflicted: When he says he has changed, what exactly does he mean? People speak louder with their actions than their words. Your recovery should remain your number one priority. Anything that takes you away from that has got to go, and if your husband will not stay sober, that means him as well.

Dear Annie: I have to object to your language about how grandchild­ren “intuitivel­y” love their grandparen­ts in your note to “Family Scapegoat.”

Unless the grandparen­ts are the children’s primary attachment, there is no reason for children to connect with them except as a reflection of the parent’s relationsh­ip with the grandparen­ts. Saying otherwise is outdated and not in line with attachment theory.

Parents should be allowed to cut unhealthy and unsafe relationsh­ips out of their children’s lives — even if those relationsh­ips are familial. — Unimpresse­d by the Greatness

Dear Unimpresse­d: You are correct, and if a grandparen­t’s behavior is unhealthy or unsafe, they should be kept away from their grandchild­ren. But if the issue is not so black and white, and the behavior is more annoying than unsafe, then the parents should set boundaries for the interactio­ns rather than cut them off altogether.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States