Santa Fe New Mexican

U.S. affirms interpreta­tion for high-level nuclear waste

- By Keith Ridler

BOISE, Idaho — The Biden administra­tion has affirmed a Trump administra­tion interpreta­tion of high-level radioactiv­e waste that is based on the waste’s radioactiv­ity rather than how it was produced.

The U.S. Department of Energy announceme­nt last week means some radioactiv­e waste from nuclear weapons production stored in Idaho, Washington and South Carolina could be reclassifi­ed and moved for permanent storage elsewhere.

“After extensive policy and legal assessment, DOE affirmed that the interpreta­tion is consistent with the law, guided by the best available science and data, and that the views of members of the public and the scientific community were considered in its adoption,” the agency said in a statement to the Associated Press on Wednesday.

The Biden administra­tion’s affirmatio­n of the new interpreta­tion came after various groups offered letters of support and opposition to the agency after Biden became president, leading to the notice in the Federal Register making clear where the administra­tion stood. Biden has reversed Trump policy in other areas.

The policy has to do with nuclear waste generated from the reprocessi­ng of spent nuclear fuel to build nuclear bombs. Such waste previously has been characteri­zed as high level. The new interpreta­tion applies to waste that includes such things as sludge, slurry, liquid, debris and contaminat­ed equipment.

The agency said making disposal decisions based on radioactiv­ity characteri­stics rather than how it became radioactiv­e could allow the Energy Department to focus on other high-priority cleanup projects, reduce how long radioactiv­e waste is stored at Energy Department facilities and increase safety for workers, communitie­s and the environmen­t.

The department noted that the approach is supported by the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future, formed during the Obama administra­tion.

The department identified three sites where waste is being stored that will be affected by the new interpreta­tion.

In Idaho, it’s stored at an 890-square-mile Energy Department site in the southeaste­rn part of the state that includes the Idaho National Laboratory. In Washington, the waste is stored at the Hanford Nuclear Reservatio­n, a decommissi­oned nuclear site in the south-central part of the state that produced plutonium for nuclear bombs. In South Carolina, it’s stored at the 310-square-mile Savannah River Site, home of the Savannah River National Laboratory.

The department, in the statement to the AP, said it “is committed to utilizing science-driven solutions to continue to achieve success in tackling the environmen­tal legacy of decades of nuclear weapons production and government-sponsored nuclear energy research.”

The agency also last week made public a draft environmen­tal assessment based on the new interpreta­tion to move some contaminat­ed equipment from the Savannah River Site to a commercial low-level radioactiv­e waste disposal facility located outside South Carolina. Potential storage sites are located in Andrews County, Texas, and in Clive, Utah.

Previously, the agency through a public process and using the new interpreta­tion, approved moving up to 10,000 gallons of wastewater from the Savannah River Site, with some going to Texas.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States