Santa Fe New Mexican

Donald Trump must be prosecuted

- Charles Blow is a columnist for The New York Times.

Former President Donald Trump may finally be indicted. Finally! The Manhattan district attorney’s office has signaled that charges, related to Trump’s reported hush-money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels, are likely.

But there’s also hand-wringing about whether this is the best case to be the first among those in which Trump is likely to be criminally charged, the strength of this case compared to others and the historic implicatio­ns of indicting a former president for anything.

And with regard to those implicatio­ns, the central considerat­ions always seem to be the importance of any precedent set by prosecutin­g a former president and the broader political significan­ce — what damage it might do to the country. Often left out of that calculus, it seems to me, is the damage Trump has already done and is poised to continue to do.

Prosecutio­n is not the problem; Trump himself is. And any pretense the allegation­s of his marauding criminalit­y are a sideshow to the political stakes and were, therefore, remedied in 2020 at the ballot box rather than in a jury box, is itself a miscarriag­e of justice and does incalculab­le damage.

Last year, around the time the House Jan. 6 committee was holding hearings, Elaine Kamarck, the founding director of the Center for Effective Public Management at the Brookings Institutio­n, wrote: “Prosecutin­g Trump is not a simple matter of determinin­g whether the evidence is there. It is a question embedded in the larger issue of how to restore and defend American democracy.”

I don’t see it that way. Any case against Trump must hang on the evidence and the principle that justice is blind. The political considerat­ions, including gaming out what might be the ideal sequence of cases, across jurisdicti­ons and by their gravity, only serve to distort the judicial process.

The justice system must be untethered from political implicatio­ns and consequenc­es, even the possibilit­y of disruptive consequenc­es.

For instance, could an indictment and prosecutio­n of Trump cause consternat­ion and possibly even unrest? Absolutely. Trump has been preparing his followers for his martyrdom for years and evangelizi­ng to them the idea that any sanctionin­g of him is an attack on them. This transferen­ce of feelings of persecutio­n and pain from manufactur­ed victimhood is a classic psychologi­cal device of a cult leader.

Last year, on a conservati­ve talk radio show, Trump said that if he were indicted in connection with his alleged mishandlin­g of classified documents, “I think you’d have problems in this country the likes of which perhaps we’ve never seen before. I don’t think the people of the United States would stand for it.”

Over and over, Trump has goaded his supporters in this direction: whether during the 2016 presidenti­al race, urging rallygoers to “knock the crap out of” people who might disrupt the proceeding­s, or telling the Proud Boys, during a 2020 debate, to “stand back and stand by.”

On Jan. 6, 2021, he waited and watched the attack on the Capitol for hours, resisting pleas from his own advisers to try to stop it. When Trump finally made a statement, he downplayed the insurrecti­on and reluctantl­y told the rioters to go home, but not without adding: “We love you. You’re very special.”

Trump is the impresario of incitement. He’ll use any attempt to hold him accountabl­e to agitate and activate his loyalists.

That’s not a reason to avoid vigorously and swiftly pursuing him legally but rather a reason to do it. If we establish a precedent that amassing a significan­t threat to society is a ward against enforcemen­t of the law, it makes a mockery of the law.

It would reinforce what was already a persistent problem in the criminal justice system: unequal treatment of the rich and powerful, compared to that of the poor and powerless.

Prosecutin­g Trump won’t break the country. On the contrary, it would be a step toward mending it, a step toward undergirdi­ng the flimsy promise of “equal justice under law.”

The eyes of the country are on these cases — the eyes of all those who’ve been badgered for minor violations, who’ve had the book thrown at them for crimes that others either got away with or served no time for. Not only are they watching but so are their loved ones and their communitie­s.

They, too, are America, and further damaging their faith in the country should matter as much as damaging the faith of any other part of our body politic.

To rehabilita­te American justice, Trump must be prosecuted.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States