Santa Fe New Mexican

Excuse me, Mr. Speaker: Don’t forget these Christian values

- Randal Balmer By the Wa Randall Balmer is the author of Saving Faith: How American Christiani­ty Can Reclaim Its Prophetic Voice.

To Speaker Mike Johnson: Congratula­tions on your selection as speaker of the House of Representa­tives. I can’t imagine why anyone would want the job, but it’s yours. When I was department chair, I often compared the job to herding cats, which I confess is not an original observatio­n. But your task is to bring some semblance of order to a sprawling amoeba-like body of ego-fired ideologues, including (let’s be honest here) the nutcase caucus: Matt Gaetz, Lauren Boebert, “Gym” Jordan and Marjorie Taylor Greene. I don’t envy you.

Although I follow politics pretty closely, I confess I was not aware of you before you emerged as candidate for speaker. I apologize, and so I’ve been following some of the reporting to learn more.

Apparently, you told Sean Hannity at Fox News that you were a “Bible-believing Christian” and that the secret to understand­ing your political views would be to “pick up a Bible off your shelf and read it. That’s my worldview.”

As a Bible-believing Christian myself, I applaud that sentiment. The world would be a far better place if more people read, understood and lived the principles found in the Bible. I honor your fidelity to the scriptures.

But as a student of the Bible, you surely know the Bible admits of many interpreta­tions and that even those who claim to be biblical literalist­s engage in what I call the ruse of selective literalism.

I gather from other comments you’ve made that homosexual­ity is “inherently unnatural” and a “dangerous lifestyle.” I suppose you derive that from the Bible, and we all know about a couple of “clobber” passages on the topic. But maybe a sense of proportion is appropriat­e here. As you know, Jesus himself said nothing whatsoever about the issue, although he did talk about divorce.

Should that be illegal, too?

And since we’re talking Leviticus here, what are you going to do with those chapters — not verses, chapters — talking about infections and rashes? Does that call for legislatio­n to outlaw certain practices — along with doing away with same-sex marriage, as you advocate?

As J. Kent Ashcraft pointed out some years ago in a letter to “Dr. Laura” Schlessing­er who had boasted about her adherence to “God’s Law” as spelled out in the Hebrew Bible, some of the passages require a bit of clarificat­ion. “I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7,” he wrote. “In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?”

Or, “Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Leviticus 19:27. How should they die?”

You get the idea.

Because you claim to be an evangelica­l Christian — and you assert, albeit falsely, that the United States is a Christian nation — I wonder if you might be on firmer ground sticking with the New Testament. If the United States is a Christian nation, shouldn’t we pay attention to what Jesus says about how his followers should behave?

It seems to me that the Sermon on the Mount — blessed are the peacemaker­s, the merciful, the poor in spirit — might be a good place to start for someone who claims the Bible dictates his policies. Matthew 25 is important also.

Jesus said that on the last day the Almighty will specifical­ly identify with “the least of these,” saying, “I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.”

I’m sure as a “Bible-believing Christian” you’ve considered the policy ramificati­ons for immigratio­n (strangers), welfare (naked, thirsty and hungry), universal health care (sick) and prison reform. Yes, many of your right-wing buddies will claim that those matters are for individual, not government, largesse, but we both know that is unrealisti­c. Besides, ever since the Reagan tax cuts in the 1980s, government policies have directed untold wealth toward the affluent.

Surely, any concern for “the least of these” requires some modificati­on of those policies.

One more thing. Rondall Reynoso of Faith on View Daily points out that there is a curious two-year gap in your official biography, 2010-12, during which you were the founding dean of Pressler Law School at Louisiana College (now Louisiana Christian University). The law school, named for Paul Pressler, a former judge and one of the now discredite­d architects of the conservati­ve takeover in the Southern Baptist Convention, never admitted a single student.

I think I speak for many Americans when I say we’d like to know more about your tenure at Louisiana College.

I wish you Godspeed in your new responsibi­lities.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States